Minister of Education Pan Wen-chung (潘文忠) yesterday said that he is against a proposal to assign faculty members to the board of directors at private schools to safeguard workers’ rights, saying that teachers serving as directors could see them serving for “certain groups,” which could violate schools’ purpose of serving in the public interest.
Pan made the statement during a meeting of the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee, where he was asked to comment on a draft amendment to the Private School Act (私立學校法) proposed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chang Liao Wan-chien (張廖萬堅).
The DPP caucus tabled its own draft amendment, with the two drafts differing greatly.
Pan said that unlike corporations, which are aimed at making profits, schools aim to serve in the public interest, adding that assigning faculty members to the post of board member could cause a school’s policymaking to lean toward certain groups.
He said that allowing faculty members to serve on the board of directors would interfere with the policymaking carried out by deans.
During a question-and-answer session with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), Pan said that “directors of public interest” selected from objective members of the public could fulfill the purpose of faculty members doubling as board members.
Ko questioned the legitimacy of the DPP’s draft amendment, which states that only private high schools and technology or vocational universities receiving more than NT$40 million (US$1.24 million), or ordinary universities receiving more than NT$80 million in annual subsidies from the ministry should be required to hire directors of public interest.
Citing as examples scandal-embroiled Nan Jeon University of Science and Technology and Chi Jen High School, Ko said that directors at schools receiving grants ranging from NT$20 million to NT$30 million are more prone to corruption, while those at well-financed schools are less prone.
Ko asked if the ministry had compiled a watchlist of private schools that could have engaged in illegal dealings or are on the verge of bankruptcy.
Pan said that there were a dozen on the list.
Ko said the ministry should publish the list to avoid public censure when new scandals erupt, but Pan said an evaluation panel would watch the schools and that the ministry would not publish the list.
DPP Legislator Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) said that Pan is under immense pressure at the helm of private school reform, given the far-reaching collusions often associated with private schools.
Wu called on Pan to sign a declaration stating that he has no suicidal intentions, lest he is murdered.
When asked if he supports designating public interest directors and supervisors to make school finances more transparent, Pan said he does.
The minister also said that he is against the rigid stratification often seen on private schools boards of directors, where seats are often “hereditary” and controlled by families.
Chang Liao underlined the importance of private school management, citing a 2014 corrective report filed by the Control Yuan, which said that the ministry had been negligent in its management of private schools.
Pan ascribed the prevalence of scandals involving private schools to the way the act was written, saying that the ministry often finds out about malpractice after a scandal erupts.
Pan said that the ministry would move toward adjusting the percentage of relatives allowed to serve on a board of directors by reducing the maximum representation of board members from the same family from one-third to one-fifth of the total number of board members.
CAUTION: Based on intelligence from the nation’s security agencies, MOFA has cautioned Taiwanese travelers about heightened safety risks in China-friendly countries The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday urged Taiwanese to be aware of their safety when traveling abroad, especially in countries that are friendly to China. China in June last year issued 22 guidelines that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death so-called “diehard” Taiwanese independence activists, even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction in Taiwan. Late last month, a senior Chinese official gave closed-door instructions to state security units to implement the guidelines in countries friendly to China, a government memo and a senior Taiwan security official said, based on information gathered by Taiwan’s intelligence agency. The
The National Immigration Agency (NIA) said yesterday that it will revoke the dependent-based residence permit of a Chinese social media influencer who reportedly “openly advocated for [China’s] unification through military force” with Taiwan. The Chinese national, identified by her surname Liu (劉), will have her residence permit revoked in accordance with Article 14 of the “Measures for the permission of family- based residence, long-term residence and settlement of people from the Mainland Area in the Taiwan Area,” the NIA said in a news release. The agency explained it received reports that Liu made “unifying Taiwan through military force” statements on her online
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, said yesterday that it is looking to hire 8,000 people this year, at a time when the tech giant is expanding production capacity to maintain its lead over competitors. To attract talent, TSMC would launch a large-scale recruitment campaign on campuses across Taiwan, where a newly recruited engineer with a master’s degree could expect to receive an average salary of NT$2.2 million (US$60,912), which is much higher than the 2023 national average of NT$709,000 for those in the same category, according to government statistics. TSMC, which accounted for more than 60 percent
Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢), a Taiwanese businessman and deputy convener of the nation’s National Climate Change Committee, said yesterday that “electrical power is national power” and nuclear energy is “very important to Taiwan.” Tung made the remarks, suggesting that his views do not align with the country’s current official policy of phasing out nuclear energy, at a forum organized by the Taiwan People’s Party titled “Challenges and Prospects of Taiwan’s AI Industry and Energy Policy.” “Taiwan is currently pursuing industries with high added- value and is developing vigorously, and this all requires electricity,” said the chairman