At a time when “transitional justice” is on everyone’s lips, Taiwan faces the questions of not only how it should be achieved, but also how “historical truth” should be received, academics said in Taipei yesterday.
In the first day of a two-day Taiwan Association of University Professors symposium titled “Transitional Justice and Law,” academics exchanged views on how transitional justice should be defined and applied.
On a theoretical level, they said that when the definition of transitional justice is over-inclusive, the term becomes meaningless.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“It has to be recognized as a normative concept, with a contextual background in which what needs to be redressed, through certain measures and projects, is systematic or institutional violence and human rights violations perpetrated in the past,” Soochow University philosophy professor Chen Jau-hwa (陳瑤華) said.
“Truth, justice, reparations and guarantees of non-recurrence are four criteria of transitional justice, and the strategies must be holistic — as expounded in a UN report — incorporating integrated attention to individual prosecutions, reparations, truth-seeking, institutional reform, vetting and dismissals, or an appropriately conceived combination thereof,” Huafan University assistant professor of philosophy Kung Wei-cheng (龔維正) said.
While Chen and Kung broadly defined transitional justice as the handling of past institutional violations of human rights, Soochow University political science professor Chen Chun-hung (陳俊宏) said that not every human rights violation should be addressed in the name of transitional justice.
“The mechanisms dealing with transitional justice, such as establishing a truth committee, reparations and institutional reforms, are linked to a particular ‘transitional moment,’ which is why they are different from the standards and operations of ordinary justice,” he said. “I am not saying that past rights violations targeting homosexuals and Aborigines, for instance, are not to be redressed, but what they really need is a standing human rights committee” to deal with a nation’s overall structural injustice.”
On the practical level, Kung said Taiwan has so far only provided financial compensation to people affected by the 228 Incident and the White Terror era, but “the right to reparations should include measures of social and psychological rehabilitation of the victims and should be accompanied by the right to truth and justice,” he said, citing the Review of the Initial Reports of the Government of Taiwan on the Implementation of the International Human Rights Covenants, which was published in 2013.
Impunity is the greatest obstruction to transitional justice, and Article 9 of the National Security Act (國家安全法), which forbids cases tried by military judicial authorities during the Martial Law period being subject to appeal or retrial in a civil court, “amounts to an amnesty for those who committed human rights violations during the White Terror era,” Kung said.
Chinese Culture University professor of law Cheng Wen-chung (鄭文中) said that in the case of government-sponsored crime, ordinary statutes of limitation requirements should not apply, because “the very reason a government exists is to protect its people.”
Forum participants said that prosecution of human rights offenders would be key to any new transitional justice efforts.
“The core of transitional justice is determining who the wrongdoers are, because only then can you begin to point out what actions are right or wrong,” Youth Synergy Taiwan Foundation researcher Lin Long-shen (林雍昇) said, adding that any transitional justice that did not punish wrongdoing would be “hypocritical” and would only have limited effectiveness.
National Chengchi University Graduate Institute of Taiwan History director Hsueh Hua-yuan (薛化元) said that focusing solely on ostensible political cases would not exhaust what needs to be redressed concerning human rights violations during the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) authoritarian regime.
He raised examples of bankruptcy and accusations of embezzlement, which he said were — according to the oral history — contrary to their economic appearances, political in essence and were selectively persecuted or convicted due to the fact that accused companies had upset then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), either by secretly aiding liberal-leaning magazines or attempting to coordinate a nationwide network of local politicians.
Hsueh called into question the redaction of files made possible by regulations governing the privacy of personal information.
However, National Taiwan University associate professor of political science Huang Chang-ling (黃長玲) said that a complete opening of political files carried the risk of turning what should be an operation for justice into a re-perpetration of human rights breaches.
Additional reporting by Abraham Gerber
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) and Chunghwa Telecom yesterday confirmed that an international undersea cable near Keelung Harbor had been cut by a Chinese ship, the Shunxin-39, a freighter registered in Cameroon. Chunghwa Telecom said the cable had its own backup equipment, and the incident would not affect telecommunications within Taiwan. The CGA said it dispatched a ship under its first fleet after receiving word of the incident and located the Shunxin-39 7 nautical miles (13km) north of Yehliu (野柳) at about 4:40pm on Friday. The CGA demanded that the Shunxin-39 return to seas closer to Keelung Harbor for investigation over the
An apartment building in New Taipei City’s Sanchong District (三重) collapsed last night after a nearby construction project earlier in the day allegedly caused it to tilt. Shortly after work began at 9am on an ongoing excavation of a construction site on Liuzhang Street (六張街), two neighboring apartment buildings tilted and cracked, leading to exterior tiles peeling off, city officials said. The fire department then dispatched personnel to help evacuate 22 residents from nine households. After the incident, the city government first filled the building at No. 190, which appeared to be more badly affected, with water to stabilize the
DEEPER REVIEW: After receiving 19 hospital reports of suspected food poisoning, the Taipei Department of Health applied for an epidemiological investigation A buffet restaurant in Taipei’s Xinyi District (信義) is to be fined NT$3 million (US$91,233) after it remained opened despite an order to suspend operations following reports that 32 people had been treated for suspected food poisoning, the Taipei Department of Health said yesterday. The health department said it on Tuesday received reports from hospitals of people who had suspected food poisoning symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, stomach pain and diarrhea, after they ate at an INPARADISE (饗饗) branch in Breeze Xinyi on Sunday and Monday. As more than six people who ate at the restaurant sought medical treatment, the department ordered the
Taiwan plans to cull as many as 120,000 invasive green iguanas this year to curb the species’ impact on local farmers, the Ministry of Agriculture said. Chiu Kuo-hao (邱國皓), a section chief in the ministry’s Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency, on Sunday said that green iguanas have been recorded across southern Taiwan and as far north as Taichung. Although there is no reliable data on the species’ total population in the country, it has been estimated to be about 200,000, he said. Chiu said about 70,000 iguanas were culled last year, including about 45,000 in Pingtung County, 12,000 in Tainan, 9,900 in
RSS