New Party Power (NPP) Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐) yesterday criticized President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) oft-trumpeted principles of equality and dignity in cross-strait relations, saying Taiwan has always been belittled under Ma’s administration.
Taking part in his first interpellation session at the legislature in the morning, which lasted about 30 minutes, Lim drew attention to the issues of Taiwan’s national identity, transitional justice and discriminatory comments toward Tao Aborigines in the film David Loman 2 (大尾鱸鰻2).
“For the past eight years, the Ma administration has insisted that cross-strait ties be furthered based on the so-called ‘1992 consensus’ and the ‘one China, different interpretations’ initiative,” Lim said after calling on Premier Simon Chang (張善政) for questioning.
Photo: Wang Yi-song, Taipei Times
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to an understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Ma had defined the cross-strait relationship as a “non-state-to-state special relationship” that he said should be maintained under the principles of equality and dignity, Lim said.
“By the president’s logic, as Taiwan is called ‘Chinese Taipei’ in international arenas, should China not also be belittled and called ‘Chinese Beijing?’” Lim said.
“Have you ever consider pressuring China into changing its name to Chinese Beijing and forbidding it to hoist its national flag and singing its national anthem at international events?” he asked Chang.
Lim said the equality and dignity many Taiwanese, including himself, aspire to see is Taiwan and China being treated equally as two separate and normal nations.
The singer-turned-politician then asked Chang and Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) what the most befitting titles for Taiwan and China at international events are if they are to conform to the principles of equality and dignity.
Chang said that under the Republic of China’s (ROC) Constitution, the ROC is a nation and that its government does not recognize the other side of the Taiwan Strait as a sovereign state.
“When it comes to international organizations, not everything can go as we wish. What they prefer to call Taiwan and China are their decisions, but Chinese Taipei is an appellation that enables us to participate in international sports events,” Chang said.
Hsia said the government has been striving to allow Taiwan to attend international events using its official title.
“If your ultimate goal is to see the coexistence of both the ROC and People’s Republic of China, then you are referring to the ‘two-state theory’ and a world where there are two Chinas. That makes you a supporter of ‘ROC independence,’” the NPP lawmaker said.
As a champion of “Taiwanese independence” himself, Lim said that he admired Hsia for going against Ma’s stance and being an advocate of “ROC independence.”
Many things might come out of the “1992 consensus” and the “one China, with different interpretations” initiative, but never equality and dignity, Lim said.
He said that since Taiwanese used their votes against Ma’s China-leaning stance and the “1992 consensus” in last month’s elections, Beijing should refrain from resorting to “despicable measures” just because the incoming government of president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) does not support the “consensus.”
The High Prosecutors’ Office yesterday withdrew an appeal against the acquittal of a former bank manager 22 years after his death, marking Taiwan’s first instance of prosecutors rendering posthumous justice to a wrongfully convicted defendant. Chu Ching-en (諸慶恩) — formerly a manager at the Taipei branch of BNP Paribas — was in 1999 accused by Weng Mao-chung (翁茂鍾), then-president of Chia Her Industrial Co, of forging a request for a fixed deposit of US$10 million by I-Hwa Industrial Co, a subsidiary of Chia Her, which was used as collateral. Chu was ruled not guilty in the first trial, but was found guilty
DEADLOCK: As the commission is unable to forum a quorum to review license renewal applications, the channel operators are not at fault and can air past their license date The National Communications Commission (NCC) yesterday said that the Public Television Service (PTS) and 36 other television and radio broadcasters could continue airing, despite the commission’s inability to meet a quorum to review their license renewal applications. The licenses of PTS and the other channels are set to expire between this month and June. The National Communications Commission Organization Act (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) stipulates that the commission must meet the mandated quorum of four to hold a valid meeting. The seven-member commission currently has only three commissioners. “We have informed the channel operators of the progress we have made in reviewing their license renewal applications, and
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) yesterday appealed to the authorities to release former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) from pretrial detention amid conflicting reports about his health. The TPP at a news conference on Thursday said that Ko should be released to a hospital for treatment, adding that he has blood in his urine and had spells of pain and nausea followed by vomiting over the past three months. Hsieh Yen-yau (謝炎堯), a retired professor of internal medicine and Ko’s former teacher, said that Ko’s symptoms aligned with gallstones, kidney inflammation and potentially dangerous heart conditions. Ko, charged with
Taiwan-based publisher Li Yanhe (李延賀) has been sentenced to three years in prison, fined 50,000 yuan (US$6,890) in personal assets and deprived political rights for one year for “inciting secession” in China, China's Taiwan Affairs Office spokesman Chen Binhua (陳斌華) said today. The Shanghai First Intermediate People’s Court announced the verdict on Feb. 17, Chen said. The trial was conducted lawfully, and in an open and fair manner, he said, adding that the verdict has since come into legal effect. The defendant reportedly admitted guilt and would appeal within the statutory appeal period, he said, adding that the defendant and his family have