Same-sex marriage proponents and opponents sparred over a proposed referendum at a Central Election Commission (CEC) hearing yesterday.
The proposed referendum topic would be on a requirement that any legislation changing the definition of marriage, custody, family or family relationships in the Civil Code (民法) be approved in a national referendum before becoming law.
Yesterday’s hearing on referendum wording was called after conservative activists associated with the Faith and Hope League submitted more than 130,000 petition signatures for a proposed referendum aimed at preventing the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Crossing the first 100,000 signature petition drive threshold would potentially move it into a second petition drive phase if its wording is approved.
Activists from both sides packed the CEC’s spacious 100-seat conference room, with a large crowd kept in the building’s lobby for hours because of space limitations.
Faith and Hope League activists said the referendum was necessary to prevent influential legislators from “sneaking through” legalization, creating “serious and irreversible” damage to social mores.
“Lawmaking in Taiwan is extremely rough and careless to the point that the people have lost faith in the legislative process,” league co-chairwoman Joanna Lei (雷倩) said.
The power concentrated in the hands of committee conveners and caucus leaders could be used to quickly hold a vote on the legalization of same-sex marriage before opponents have time to mobilize, she said.
Rumors that legislators were considering “sneaking through” such legislation sparked a massive rally along Katagalan Boulevard in 2013, with a related referendum petition serving as the inspiration for activists’ current drive.
“This referendum is aimed at reducing social costs,” league co-chairman Chen Chih-hung (陳志宏) said.
He said that requiring a referendum before same-sex marriage is legalized would demonstrate whether there is a full “social consensus” on the issue, reducing controversy and protests.
Opponent of the referendum said it would unconstitutionally limit the Legislative Yuan’s power to pass laws.
“These restrictions would apply to nearly the entire family relations section of the Civil Code and would amount to stripping the legislators elected by the people of their lawmaking authority,” said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女), who was one of the principal sponsors of the 2013 bill.
“Passing laws is part of the Legislative Yuan’s authority — when we amend laws as times change, there is absolutely no requirement that there be a referendum,” she said, adding that referendums were constitutionally intended to supplement — not replace — representative democracy.
“Holding a referendum every time we need to amend articles which are related to marriage and family would be time-consuming and strip the Legislative Yuan of the ability to respond quickly to societal changes,” attorney and women’s rights advocate Lee Yen-jong (李晏榕) said. “Under our constitutional system, direct democracy and indirect democracy are supposed to supplement and complement each other, rather than restraining each other.”
Constitutional concerns were echoed by government official who spoke at the hearing, with officials also saying the broad referendum language was inconsistent with Referendum Act (公民投票法) requirements.
Lin Hsiu-lian (林秀蓮), director of the Ministry of Justice Department of Legal Affairs, said the referendum should not be approved because it would not clearly establish or overturn a law or important national policy as required and also potentially could be viewed as including several different topics because of its scope.
Civil society groups yesterday protested outside the Legislative Yuan, decrying Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) efforts to pass three major bills that they said would seriously harm Taiwan’s democracy, and called to oust KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁). It was the second night of the three-day “Bluebird wintertime action” protests in Taipei, with organizers announcing that 8,000 people attended. Organized by Taiwan Citizen Front, the Economic Democracy Union (EDU) and a coalition of civil groups, about 6,000 people began a demonstration in front of KMT party headquarters in Taipei on Wednesday, organizers said. For the third day, the organizers asked people to assemble
Taipei is participating in Osaka’s Festival of Lights this year, with a 3m-tall bubble tea light installation symbolizing Taiwan’s bubble tea culture. The installation is designed as a bubble tea cup and features illustrations of Taipei’s iconic landmarks, such as Taipei 101, the Red House and North Gate, as well as soup dumplings and the matchmaking deity the Old Man Under the Moon (月下老人), affectionately known as Yue Lao (月老). Taipei and Osaka have collaborated closely on tourism and culture since Taipei first participated in the festival in 2018, the Taipei City Department of Information and Tourism said. In February, Osaka represented
POOR IMPLEMENTATION: Teachers welcomed the suspension, saying that the scheme disrupted school schedules, quality of learning and the milk market A policy to offer free milk to all school-age children nationwide is to be suspended next year due to multiple problems arising from implementation of the policy, the Executive Yuan announced yesterday. The policy was designed to increase the calcium intake of school-age children in Taiwan by drinking milk, as more than 80 percent drink less than 240ml per day. The recommended amount is 480ml. It was also implemented to help Taiwanese dairy farmers counter competition from fresh milk produced in New Zealand, which is to be imported to Taiwan tariff-free next year when the Agreement Between New Zealand and
Taiwanese professional baseball should update sports stadiums and boost engagement to enhance fans’ experience, Chinese Professional Baseball League (CPBL) commissioner Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) told the Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times) in an interview on Friday. The league has urged Farglory Group and the Taipei City Government to improve the Taipei Dome’s outdated equipment, including relatively rudimentary television and sound systems, and poor technology, he said. The Tokyo Dome has markedly better television and sound systems, despite being 30 years old, because its managers continually upgraded its equipment, Tsai said. In contrast, the Taipei Dome lacked even a room for referees
RSS