Tue, Dec 01, 2015 page3

• NPP calls for meaningful reform of negotiations

  • By Abraham Gerber / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  New Power Party (NPP) legislative candidates yesterday castigated “insincere” Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposals for reforming the Legislative Yuan, calling for meaningful restrictions on the legal role of cross-caucus negotiations as part of any reform package.

  “It is fundamentally about manipulating the election and cheating votes out of people,” said NPP legislative candidate Chiu Hsien-chih (邱顯智), adding that the KMT’s legislative caucus had previously repeatedly rejected reforms similar to those proposed by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) last week.

  Chiu’s campaign manager, Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷), a prominent leader in last year’s Sunflower movement, called proposals by Wang “fake” and “non-democratic.”

  

  New Power Party member Chen Wei-ting, left, and chairman Huang Kuo-chang, center, attend a press conference in Taipei yesterday, announcing the party’s new proposals for legislative reform.

  Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times

  Wang last week called for drafting new legislation to clearly spell out committee hearing procedures along with other changes, calling on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to present a competing proposal by Thursday, at the same inviting Chen and fellow Sunflower leader Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) to meet and discuss legislative reform.

  Chiu said Wang’s proposal would further increase the power of the legislative speaker and the different party caucus whips, to whom it would dedicate sole power to call cross-caucus negotiations, removing current legal provision allowing individual legislators to use a petition drive to initiate negotiations.

  “Our main criticism of cross-caucus negotiations is that they are extremely authoritarian — concentrating power in the hands of a few, while diluting the power of individual legislators to exercise their legislative authority,” he said, adding that removing individual legislators power to call talks would be “taking a step in the wrong direction.”

  Hsu Wei-chun (徐偉群), a professor of law at Chung Yuan University, said that under current rules, any results of cross-caucus negotiations are sent directly the legislative floor where they are passed automatically, unless eight or more legislators sign a petition requiring a vote. Speeches about the results can be made from the legislative floor only by party representatives designated by party leaders, he said.

  Citizen’s Congress Watch executive director Chang Hung-lin (張宏林) said the secrecy of cross-caucus negotiations allows legislators to avoid taking a stance on controversial legislation, adding that its existence also discouraged legislators from investing time in budget reviews.

  “Every time you work hard to conduct a review, if there is any disagreement, then a cross-caucus negotiation will be called — so what is the point of working hard to review every budget item? Our budget review process has already degenerated into cross-board cuts decided via cross-caucus negotiations,” he said.

  Chiu called for use of cross-caucus negotiations to be limited to parliamentary procedure, such as agenda setting, rather than the specific content of bills.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Cabinet mulls chip aid after Trump threat

  • 2

    AI scare to boost Taipei-US ties: expert

  • 3

    First Replicator initiative on track: US

  • 4

    Coast guard identifies 52 ‘suspicious’ Chinese ships

  • 5

    Manila arrests Chinese spies posing as Taiwanese