A severe shortage of hospice services in hospitals and health centers across the nation could have a severe impact on the elderly and terminally ill patients, the Taiwan Healthcare Reform Foundation said yesterday.
“Nearly 86 percent of respondents to a survey conducted last month by the foundation said they would prefer painless hospice care at home or in local communities, rather than being kept alive by a ventilator. However, whether that hope will be dashed may hinge entirely on where they live,” foundation chairwoman Liu Mei-chun (劉梅君) told a news conference in Taipei.
Liu said that while it is common knowledge that the nation is rapidly becoming a “super-aged society,” in an evaluation of the availability, accessibility and policy of hospice care services, just two out of 19 cities and counties scored more than 41 out of 50 points — the minimum requirement for a five-star rating by the foundation.
In addition to the two five-starred administrative regions, Greater Taoyuan and Yilan County, five regions earned four stars: Greater Taichung, Chiayi and Hsinchu cities, and Changhua and Hualien counties, Liu said.
“It is worth noting that Taipei, despite being equipped with relatively abundant end-stage palliative care resources, scored just 30 on the test and was given a three-star rating, as its relatively large elderly population of 360,000 people has resulted in a high demand for end-of-life care,” Liu said, adding that Yulin County was rated the lowest, because it was lacking in all aspects of palliative care.
Another pressing problem is the wide gap in hospice care resources between cities and counties, Liu said, citing statistics that showed each hospice care facility in Chiayi City is responsible for an average of 189 cancer patients, for example, compared with 977 per facility in Yunlin County and an average of 364 per facility nationwide.
“In addition, about eight hospice palliative care beds are available per 100,000 residents in Hualien County, while people living in Nantou County have no such facilities at all,” Liu said.
More troubling, Liu said, is that nine out of the nation’s 50 “sub-medical regions” — population centers within larger medical service areas — were found to be without palliative care, lacking hospice beds, community services or home care options, Liu said.
Three are in Taitung County, two in Pingtung County and one each in Miaoli, Nantou, Yulin and Hualien counties, she added.
Foundation deputy executive director Phoebe Chen (陳芙媺) said its researchers have determined the root causes of the problems, which include indifference from local government leadership and reluctance among hospitals to promote hospice care because it is less lucrative than other hospital services.
“So far, only the governments of Taoyuan, Changhua, New Taipei City and Nantou have endeavored to promote community-based palliative care, while others rely solely on the services provided by the National Health Insurance program and have done little to build a hospice care network,” Chen said.
Despite the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s oft-touted efforts in facilitating hospice care, Chen said that just three of the nation’s 27 ministry-affiliated hospitals have palliative care beds, which are also absent in established cancer-oriented medical institutions such as Taipei’s Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital and the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital in New Taipei City.
The foundation urged local governments and the ministry to prioritize the provision of palliative care.

The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of

Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading

‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to