More than 30 university professors, high-school teachers, student and civic group representatives yesterday held a press conference to urge the Ministry of Education to drop its proposed “minor adjustments” to high-school history, civics and Chinese-language textbooks.
The textbook controversy shows no sign of winding down as more academics, students and social organizations criticize the ministry, claiming it has abused its authority and broken the law.
The ministry says the adjustments were lawfully proposed to ensure the curriculum “abides by the Constitution,” but academics and teachers said that the ministry’s contention that the procedures were legal and the adjustments are constitutional has not been substantiated.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The essence of the Constitution is to protect the basic rights of the people and set down the framework of a government with its power being regulated and checked, “not provide guidelines for history education,” National Taiwan University history professor Chou Wan-yao (周婉窈) said.
Chang Mao-kuei (張茂桂), a researcher at Academia Sinica’s sociology institute and a former curriculum committee member, said there was no immediate need for adjustments and called for an open debate with the team that proposed the changes.
Civics Teachers Action Alliance representative Huang Yi-chung (黃益中) said the ministry was “trying to mask its arbitrary action by paying lip service to procedure.”
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
To make a minor change to the curriculum required the proposal to go through the National Academy for Education Research’s Committee of Curriculum Development (CCD) and the ministry’s Curriculum Examining Committee, he said.
The required procedures had been followed at the curriculum development stage, with opinions sought from the working group of curriculum development, the reviewing task force and the Civics and Society Resource Center, as well as through public hearings, Huang said.
“However, the truth is that none of the steps taken were above board,” Huang said. “Working group convener Wang Yin (王垠), who is the principal of National Yilan Senior High School, has said that he did not know about the content of the adjustments until he read about them in a newspaper.”
“At the only meeting with the reviewing task force [none of whom had a professional background in history] that civics teachers attended, Tainan Girls’ Senior High School teacher Chen Cheng-yi (陳正益) said the agenda was set to discuss the proposed adjustments under the premise that the curriculum would be adjusted according to the Constitution,” Huang said.
The Civics and Society Resource Center was telephoned and contacted by e-mail, not through official documents, to send a representative to the task force meetings — and only on the day of the meeting or the day before, he said.
Many teachers said the notice of the public hearing was given too late for them to participate, Huang said, adding that there were documents to back up that assertion.
National Federation of Teachers’ Unions vice president Wu Chung-tai (吳忠泰) said the entire procedure had been unjust.
“Comparing the procedures followed when the math and natural science curricula were adjusted to the way changes to Chinese language and social studies textbooks were made, one cannot help but find the discrepancies suspicious,” Wu said.
A detailed chart provided by Wu shows that proposed changes to the math and natural science curricula were discussed for almost a year, while the discussion period for the Chinese language and social studies changes was three to four months.
While the task force for the math and science changes included high school teachers of those subjects as conveners, the task force reviewing the Chinese language and social studies was made up of “omnipotent, multi-disciplinary” reviewers, Wu said.
This story has been amended since it was first published.
Civil society groups yesterday protested outside the Legislative Yuan, decrying Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) efforts to pass three major bills that they said would seriously harm Taiwan’s democracy, and called to oust KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁). It was the second night of the three-day “Bluebird wintertime action” protests in Taipei, with organizers announcing that 8,000 people attended. Organized by Taiwan Citizen Front, the Economic Democracy Union (EDU) and a coalition of civil groups, about 6,000 people began a demonstration in front of KMT party headquarters in Taipei on Wednesday, organizers said. For the third day, the organizers asked people to assemble
POOR IMPLEMENTATION: Teachers welcomed the suspension, saying that the scheme disrupted school schedules, quality of learning and the milk market A policy to offer free milk to all school-age children nationwide is to be suspended next year due to multiple problems arising from implementation of the policy, the Executive Yuan announced yesterday. The policy was designed to increase the calcium intake of school-age children in Taiwan by drinking milk, as more than 80 percent drink less than 240ml per day. The recommended amount is 480ml. It was also implemented to help Taiwanese dairy farmers counter competition from fresh milk produced in New Zealand, which is to be imported to Taiwan tariff-free next year when the Agreement Between New Zealand and
A woman who allegedly spiked the food and drinks of an Australian man with rat poison, leaving him in intensive care, has been charged with attempted murder, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office said yesterday. The woman, identified by her surname Yang (楊), is accused of repeatedly poisoning Alex Shorey over the course of several months last year to prevent the Australian man from leaving Taiwan, prosecutors said in a statement. Shorey was evacuated back to Australia on May 3 last year after being admitted to intensive care in Taiwan. According to prosecutors, Yang put bromadiolone, a rodenticide that prevents blood from
A Japanese space rocket carrying a Taiwanese satellite blasted off yesterday, but was later seen spiraling downward in the distance as the company said the launch attempt had failed. It was the second attempt by the Japanese start-up Space One to become the country’s first private firm to put a satellite into orbit, after its first try in March ended in a mid-air explosion. This time, its solid-fuel Kairos rocket had been carrying five satellites, including one from the Taiwan Space Agency and others designed by Japanese students and corporate ventures. Spectators gathered near the company’s coastal Spaceport Kii launch pad in Japan’s