Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) yesterday dismissed Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng’s (王金平) proposal that a “cross-strait affairs panel” be established to report to the legislature to strengthen its supervision of the government, saying that this could lead to a constitutional dispute.
Wang Yu-chi made the remarks before attending the 15th public hearing held by the legislature on the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement.
The legislative speaker put forth the idea on Saturday last week in an attempt to give lawmakers access to cross-strait trade negotiations, saying that the pact caused such controversy because the legislature had been left out of the agreement’s negotiations.
Photo: CNA
He also cited as an example the US’ trade negotiations with other nations, in which two US senators and two US representatives were allowed to participate in and supervise the negotiation process and routinely briefed US Congress on the latest progress.
Lawmakers have made similar suggestions in 2000, proposing that such a panel be led by the legislative speaker and made up of members recommended by various political parties in proportion to the number of their legislative seats.
“There have been calls for the government to set up a mechanism similar to the one implemented by the US for its trade talks to allow [the legislature] to participate in cross-strait trade negotiations. However, the US Congress is only allowed to join the negotiations because it is given the power by the US Constitution to regulate trade with other nations,” Wang Yu-chi said.
The minister added that only a handful of nations, including the US, but not including Taiwan, granted their parliaments such a right.
“The public is advised to take into account the reasons these nations designed their constitutions differently when discussing [the possibility of forming such a panel] to avoid a constitutional conflict,” Wang Yu-chi said.
Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said on Saturday last week that the party planned to place Wang Jin-pyng’s proposal on the agenda for the next legislative session, which is to begin on Feb. 21, “as the nation cannot afford to wait any longer.”
Meanwhile, Wang Yu-chi yesterday pledged to stand firm on the government’s position on cross-strait relations during his planned visit to China.
The government’s principal policy toward China remains unchanged — maintaining the “status quo” of “no unification, no independence, no use of force” based on the Republic of China Constitution, Wang Yu-chi said.
The MAC minister is expected to travel to China in the middle of next month to meet with his Chinese counterpart, Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍).
It will be Wang’s first visit to China in his official capacity and the first formal meeting between the two officials tasked with handling ties across the Taiwan Strait.
Seeking to keep Wang Yu-chi on a tight leash during the trip, legislators reached a cross-party consensus last week to forbid him from embarking on any negotiations, signing any papers or issuing any news releases or statements on such political issues as “one China,” the “one China framework,” “one country, two regions,” a “military confidence-building mechanism,” “peace agreement,” or “political relations arrangement in stages.”
The legislators also require that Wang Yu-chi should not accept or echo claims that put the nation’s sovereignty at risk, such as the “one China framework,” or “opposition to Taiwan independence.”
Additional reporting by Tseng Wei-chen
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
Taiwan’s passport ranked 34th in the world, with access to 141 visa-free destinations, according to the latest update to the Henley Passport Index released today. The index put together by Henley & Partners ranks 199 passports globally based on the number of destinations holders can access without a visa out of 227, and is updated monthly. The 141 visa-free destinations for Taiwanese passport holders are a slight decrease from last year, when holders had access to 145 destinations. Botswana and Columbia are among the countries that have recently ended visa-free status for Taiwanese after “bowing to pressure from the Chinese government,” the Ministry
‘SIGN OF DANGER’: Beijing has never directly named Taiwanese leaders before, so China is saying that its actions are aimed at the DPP, a foundation official said National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) yesterday accused Beijing of spreading propaganda, saying that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had singled out President William Lai (賴清德) in his meeting with US President Joe Biden when talking about those whose “true nature” seek Taiwanese independence. The Biden-Xi meeting took place on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Peru on Saturday. “If the US cares about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in seeking Taiwanese independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra
HEALTHCARE: Following a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, Taiwanese traveling overseas for six months would no longer be able to suspend their insurance Measures allowing people to suspend National Health Insurance (NHI) services if they plan to leave the country for six months would be abolished starting Dec. 23, NHIA Director-General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) said yesterday. The decision followed the Constitutional Court’s ruling in 2022 that the regulation was unconstitutional and that it would invalidate the regulation automatically unless the NHIA amended it to conform with the Constitution. The agency would amend the regulations to remove the articles and sections that allow the suspension of NHI services, and also introduce provisional clauses for those who suspended their NHI services before Dec. 23, Shih said. According to
RSS