The US should try to amend the rules of membership for key international organizations so that Taiwan can join them, a new study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) says.
Written by CSIS Asia expert Bonnie Glaser, the 50-page report Taiwan’s Quest for Greater Participation in the International Community makes a series of wide-ranging recommendations.
It also reveals that a senior People’s Republic of China (PRC) official told a visiting CSIS delegation three months ago that China prefers to find a “comprehensive solution” to the issue of Taiwan’s international space.
“One precondition is that Taipei must express or demonstrate through concrete actions that Taiwan adheres to ‘one China,’” the report says.
The official told CSIS: “If we can feel [Taiwan’s] sincerity on this issue then giving Taiwan international space can be good for reunification.”
The report says that it “remains unclear” what Taiwan has to do to show sincerity and Beijing “reserves the right” to determine whether or not Taipei has done so.
It says that Beijing recognizes that blocking Taiwan’s international space could further weaken President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) popularity at home and reduce domestic support for his policy of improving cross-strait relations.
Moreover, China wants to win the hearts and minds of the people of Taiwan, the majority of whom attach great importance to the issue of international space, it says.
The US should, in consultation with the PRC and other countries, seek to revise or amend the charters or rules of membership for key international organizations so that Taiwan can join in some capacity without raising sovereignty matters, Glaser says.
“Given their respective influential statuses within international organizations, the US and China have significant leverage to execute such changes,” she says.
In addition, Glaser says the US should help Taiwan to make the necessary structural adjustments so it can make gains toward Trans-Pacific Partnership standards. It should support Taiwan’s expanded role in organizations in which it is already a party, and emphasize to Beijing that it hurts its own goals with Taiwan by its “begrudging approach” to the issue of Taiwan’s international space.
China should provide greater support for Taiwan’s international space to further its broader cross-strait policy and work with the US to find suitable terminology and implement changes in organizational charters or rules, she says.
China should also provide “unqualified support and assistance” for Taiwan to participate in the regional economic integration. process.
“Taiwan’s ambiguous international status has long complicated its ability to participate in international organizations in which the rest of the world shares information and makes critical global decisions,” Glaser says.
“Being barred from international economic organizations erodes Taiwan’s international competitiveness and hinders economic liberalization of the domestic economy, as well as its further integration regionally,” she says.
Glaser says the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and many countries in the EU support a larger role for Taiwan in the international community.
In all, she makes 12 recommendations for action by Taiwan, five for China and five for the US.
Beijing has blocked Taiwan from joining many international organizations — particularly those that require statehood for membership — because it fears that membership might encourage Taipei to seek independence.
“Taiwan is left out of the loop,” Glaser says, adding that many states are unable or unwilling to risk “Beijing’s ire” by lobbying on Taiwan’s behalf, she says.
Taiwan’s ability to pursue and expand its international footprint is limited by the unique challenges it faces, particularly ambiguity surrounding its statehood and relations vis-a-vis Beijing, the study says.
China is fearful that as Taiwan’s global participation independent of China continues to grow, the nation could use its increased space to push for de jure independence, Glaser says.
“This fear exists despite the fact that Beijing’s considerable economic and political influence in the world makes it extremely unlikely that Taipei could leverage its presence in international organizations to achieve independence,” she says.
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to