The US supports cross-strait military confidence-building measures (CBM), but there is no policy of actively promoting them, a Washington roundtable discussion was told on Tuesday.
“That is an important distinc-tion,” said Bonnie Glaser, a consultant for the US government on East Asia.
The cross-strait agenda, whether it is CBMs or other issues, is up to the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to determine, she said.
“We don’t push, we don’t pressure Taiwan in any dialogue or any issue that Taiwan judges to be premature,” said Glaser, who works on Chinese foreign and security policy with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is worried that if Taiwan pursues military CBMs with China it will result in a reduction or an end to arms sales from the US, she said.
“I have heard the president profess this concern several times,” she said.
However, Glaser said at the roundtable organized by the Sigur Center for Asian Studies at George Washington University that this was not likely to be an outcome of certain kinds of CBMs between Taiwan and China.
Glaser, a frequent visitor to Taiwan, said the US had the “utmost confidence” that Taiwan could decide for itself what was in its interests.
She said claims that the US had “strongly told” the Ma administration not to talk about military CBMs with China were “nonsense.”
Some kinds of CBMs — for example an emergency “hotline” — could enable both sides to avoid an incident from escalating.
“The US supports CBMs if and when Taiwan is ready to discuss them,” Glaser said.
Former US president George W. Bush convinced Beijing that the US does not support Taiwanese independence, she said.
“Bush told Beijing leaders privately that the US opposed Taiwan independence,” she said.
However, China is not confident that the US will accept peaceful unification.
“US arms sales to Taiwan pretty clearly are not for a Taiwan offensive against the mainland [China],” she said. “The logic that makes sense is that China reduces the threat opposite Taiwan and Taiwan might then reconsider or factor into the decisions it makes about the arms it needs to buy and about the defense capabilities it needs to have,” Glaser said.
She said that maybe then Taiwan would feel it did not need to buy weapons from the US.
Alan Romberg, director of the East Asia program at the Stimson Center, said that Beijing maintained a large missile force opposite Taiwan to deter independence.
“Even though I believe the possibility of any Taiwan leadership moving towards de jure independence is somewhere between zero and minus-70, Beijing fears the consequences of saying that it would not use force in any circumstances,” Romberg said.
“Until the day of unification the PLA [People’s Liberation Army] is going to be required to maintain the capability to deal with any move toward independence,” he said.
Romberg said that China was not “looking for a fight” and wanted to achieve its goals by diplomacy, but there was concern Beijing would “lose patience.”
Despite China’s suspicions to the contrary, the US relationship with Taiwan was not part of “some strategy to constrain China and limit its power much less to advance Taiwan independence,” he said.
“The US does not favor or support Taiwan independence, but if the two sides miraculously agreed to it we would certainly be happy to go along,” Romberg said.
Even though Taiwan remained a potential cause of friction between Washington and Beijing, Romberg said, the situation had evolved to the point where all three parties were being careful not to create turmoil or crisis.
“In this situation, over time, certain kinds of CBMs might be considered,” he said.
However, Li Da-jung (李大中), an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies at Tamkang University, said that cross-strait negotiations were moving into a new phase, with Taipei trying to set the pace.
He said Taiwan was carefully choosing the issues on the negotiating table, but that there was a lack of domestic consensus in support of CBMs.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by