The government’s “vague” explanations of the legality of China establishing a representative office in Taiwan are akin to justifying bringing an enemy into one’s house because Beijing would be able to gather intelligence and carry out its unification ambition under the protection of Taiwanese law, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) caucus said yesterday following the announcement last week that Taiwan and China may set up cross-strait representative offices later this year.
Currently, there are offices on both sides that issue travel documents, TSU Legislator Lin Shih-chia (林世嘉) told a press conference, adding that the moves to set up representative offices could be politically motivated and the result of a “wink-wink deal” between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party to promote bilateral political talks.
Talks about opening a Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) in China and an Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS) offices in Taiwan have already begun.
TSU Legislator Hsu Chung-hsin (許忠信) criticize President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration for “unilaterally” granting China diplomatic privileges and immunities without a guarantee of reciprocity.
Hsu added that if Taiwan’s office in China is unable to deal with consular affairs and protect Taiwanese residing there, it would be a meaningless agency because personal safety and rights are among the most important issues for Taiwanese businesspeople in China.
Former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Kuo Cheng-liang (郭正亮) said it made no sense for the pan-green camp to support the institutionalization and normalization of cross-strait relations, while at the same time opposing the establishment of the offices.
With regards to security concerns, Kuo said that every diplomatic mission in the world — including Taiwan’s — is tasked with gathering intelligence, adding that China already has numerous channels through which to gather intelligence in Taiwan.
Meanwhile, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said that Taiwan would initially plan to set up three representative offices in China.
Wang made the remarks on the sidelines of a questio-and-answer session at the legislature where Wang, Minister of the Interior Lee Hong-yuan (李鴻源) and Straits Exchange Foundation Chairman Lin Join-sane (林中森) answered questions from legislators on the government’s plans for the establishment of the representative offices and a proposal to allow more white-collar Chinese to work in Taiwan.
Wang said that given the number of SEF staff, the government could initially establish a maximum of three representative offices in China — one in Beijing, in central China and in southern China.
“It is likely that that number would increase in the future, but we could discuss the final number at a later date,” Wang said.
During a question-and-answer session at the meeting, DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) said that since setting up representative offices on both sides was an extremely sensitive matter, there was a risk of agitating the public if the council did not handle the matter carefully.
“Is it possible that China will establish 10 offices in Taiwan at once? Could China’s national flag be unfurled next to Taiwan’s national flags at these offices?” Tuan asked.
Wang responded that the government was unlikely to initially allow Beijing to set up 10 offices and that the number of offices would be negotiated at cross-strait meetings and decided by “the needs of both sides.”
“However, the council will not permit the ARATS to establish a representative office in all of Taiwan’s administrative regions,” Wang said.
As to whether Taiwan could unfurl its national flag at such offices, Wang said that China had yet to respond to the matter, but both sides would continue to deliberate the issue.
In related news, SEF Vice Chairman Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉) left for China yesterday to see how Taiwan-owned companies in the cities of Chengdu and Chongqing are faring.
Prior to his departure, Kao said that Beijing is prioritizing the development of western China, and Chongqing and Chengdu are high on its investment list.
“Many of our electronics manufacturers have invested in the two cities and we’d like to know how they’re doing,” Kao said.
Kao, who is traveling with a delegation of SEF officials and trade experts, said he will meet senior executives of Taiwanese businesses in Chengdu and Chongqing to discuss any problems they may be having and if they need the SEF’s assistance.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS