A US military expert has written that if Chinese and Japanese forces met in battle over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), the outcome would be difficult to predict.
“Such a fight appeared farfetched before 2010, when Japan’s Coast Guard apprehended Chinese fishermen who rammed one of its vessels off the disputed islands, but it appears more likely now,” James Holmes, an associate professor of strategy at the US Naval War College, wrote in Foreign Policy magazine this week.
Holmes said that China’s leaders are “clearly thinking about the unthinkable.”
However, Japan would not be a pushover, he wrote.
He said the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) has accumulated several pockets of material excellence, such as undersea warfare, and their sailors were renowned for their professionalism.
“If commanders manage their human, material and geographic advantages artfully, Tokyo could make a maritime war with China a close-run thing — and perhaps even prevail,” Holmes wrote.
He said a straightforward China-on-Japan war was doubtful unless Beijing managed to isolate Tokyo diplomatically or Tokyo isolated itself through “foolish diplomacy.”
Barring that, Holmes said a conflict would probably ensnare the US as an active combatant on the Japanese side.
However, discounting politics, a contest between Chinese and Japanese sea power would be no contest in purely numerical terms.
Japan has 48 major surface combatant ships, including light aircraft carriers, guided-missile destroyers, frigates and corvettes and 16 diesel-electric submarines.
The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) boasts 73 major surface combatants, 84 missile-firing patrol craft and 63 submarines.
“China’s navy is far superior in sheer weight of steel,” Holmes wrote.
However, the PLAN is untested and its quality unsure.
The quality of the JMSDF’s Navy and its human capabilities “could partially or wholly offset the PLA’s advantage of numbers.”
“JMSDF flotillas ply Asian waters continually, operating solo or with other navies. The PLA Navy is inert by comparison,” he wrote.
He said that in general, Chinese fleets emerge only for brief cruises or exercises, leaving crews little time to develop an operating rhythm or learn their profession.
The human edge goes to Japan.
Because China and Japan are close to each other, both countries’ land-based firepower needs to be factored in, Holmes said.
PLA conventional ballistic missiles could strike land sites throughout Asia, putting Japanese assets at risk before they ever left port or took to the sky.
China’s Second Artillery Corps, or missile force, has reportedly fielded anti-ship ballistic missiles able to strike moving ships at sea from China.
However, if Japan forward-deployed Type 88 ASCMs — mobile, easily transportable anti-ship weapons — and missile crews to the islets and to neighboring islands in the Ryukyu chain, its ground troops could generate overlapping fields of fire that would “convert nearby seas into no-go zones for Chinese shipping.”
Holmes concluded that whoever best combined sea, land and air forces stood a good chance of winning a conflict.
“That could be Japan if its political and military leaders think creatively, procure the right hardware and arrange it on the map for maximum effect,” he wrote.
Holmes said Japan would not need to defeat China’s military to win a showdown at sea because it already holds the “contested real estate.”
“If Northeast Asian seas became a no-man’s land, but Japanese forces hung on, the political victory would be Tokyo’s,” he says.
Finally, Holmes said that if China lost much of its fleet in a Sino-Japanese clash — even in a winning effort — Beijing could see its momentum toward world-power status “reversed in an afternoon.”
CAUTION: Based on intelligence from the nation’s security agencies, MOFA has cautioned Taiwanese travelers about heightened safety risks in China-friendly countries The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday urged Taiwanese to be aware of their safety when traveling abroad, especially in countries that are friendly to China. China in June last year issued 22 guidelines that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death so-called “diehard” Taiwanese independence activists, even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction in Taiwan. Late last month, a senior Chinese official gave closed-door instructions to state security units to implement the guidelines in countries friendly to China, a government memo and a senior Taiwan security official said, based on information gathered by Taiwan’s intelligence agency. The
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, said yesterday that it is looking to hire 8,000 people this year, at a time when the tech giant is expanding production capacity to maintain its lead over competitors. To attract talent, TSMC would launch a large-scale recruitment campaign on campuses across Taiwan, where a newly recruited engineer with a master’s degree could expect to receive an average salary of NT$2.2 million (US$60,912), which is much higher than the 2023 national average of NT$709,000 for those in the same category, according to government statistics. TSMC, which accounted for more than 60 percent
The National Immigration Agency (NIA) said yesterday that it will revoke the dependent-based residence permit of a Chinese social media influencer who reportedly “openly advocated for [China’s] unification through military force” with Taiwan. The Chinese national, identified by her surname Liu (劉), will have her residence permit revoked in accordance with Article 14 of the “Measures for the permission of family- based residence, long-term residence and settlement of people from the Mainland Area in the Taiwan Area,” the NIA said in a news release. The agency explained it received reports that Liu made “unifying Taiwan through military force” statements on her online
Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢), a Taiwanese businessman and deputy convener of the nation’s National Climate Change Committee, said yesterday that “electrical power is national power” and nuclear energy is “very important to Taiwan.” Tung made the remarks, suggesting that his views do not align with the country’s current official policy of phasing out nuclear energy, at a forum organized by the Taiwan People’s Party titled “Challenges and Prospects of Taiwan’s AI Industry and Energy Policy.” “Taiwan is currently pursuing industries with high added- value and is developing vigorously, and this all requires electricity,” said the chairman
RSS