Since Taiwan opened its doors to Chinese students, complaints have risen that China’s Cross-strait Student Recruitment Center has made more money than Taiwanese schools and travel agencies.
A total of 933 Chinese students were accepted by Taiwanese universities last year, according to college administrators. School admission fees totaled about NT$7 million (US$237,000), with the Chinese Cross-strait Student Recruitment Center taking in NT$2.6 million for providing certified transcripts of records and other service fees.
To allay concern that allowing Chinese students into Taiwanese universities might affect educational and job opportunities for local students and graduates, the Ministry of Education has imposed restrictions on Chinese enrollment, known as the “three limits, six noes” policy.
Under the policy, acceptance is limited to Chinese students from prestigious Chinese schools, the number of Chinese students is restricted to 0.1 percent of total domestic student recruitment and Chinese students are barred from courses in pharmacy, Chinese and Western medicine, high-tech and national security.
As for the six noes, they refer to no entrance examinations for Chinese students, ensuring that their enrolment would not impact on local student recruitment, no scholarships, no off-campus work for Chinese students, and they cannot join tests for Republic of China professional certifications or civil servant examinations.
Some universities have expressed dissatisfaction over the Chinese center making so much money, while the universities themselves have not benefited and had to cover the recruitment costs themselves.
The universities say they lose thousands of New Taiwan dollars for every Chinese student who is recruited.
Chang Hong-de (張鴻德), secretary-general of University Entrance Committee for Mainland Chinese Students, said that 1,700 Chinese students had applied for university entrance and another 700 for graduate school. The center charged NT$350 for each university application, NT$1,350 for graduate school and NT$2,450 for doctorates.
Asked why Taiwanese universities were not able to get any money from student recruitment, Chang said China’s city and provincial governments take charge of collecting diplomas and transcript of records, while the Cross-strait Student Recruitment Center charges a one-time fee of 500,000 yuan (US$79,200).
After negotiations, the committee and the center settled on the figure of NT$2.6 million, or one-third of the total admission fees, Chang said.
With the rest of the funds being spent on the committee’s daily operations, the committee told the universities that they would not be alloted any money to cover processing fees for Chinese students, Chang said.
The universities have complained that their budget for recruitment of Chinese students was in the red because they have to pay out of their own pockets for professors to review the students’ applications.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said the issue showed glaring deficiencies in cross-strait collaboration, adding that Beijing’s ban on direct recruitment of Chinese students by Taiwanese universities had only benefited the center.
A large part of the fees go into verifying documents and doing education background checks, because of fears in Taiwan that some Chinese diplomas might be fake, Department of Higher Education director Ho Cho-fei (何卓飛) said.
If the universities are unhappy about the admission fees, they will have to settle the issue with the committee, Ho said.
Chang said that after student recruitment concludes next month, the committee would welcome any debate regarding raising Chinese students’ admission fees.
However, many academics say that China has its own limits and standards on what scores students need to apply for studies in Taiwan.
As Chinese students need only to achieve the secondary score line of the National Higher Education Entrance Examination, it appears that China does not want its better students to go to Taiwan for studies, some academics said, adding that recruitment rates for Chinese students this year do not look promising.
Translated by Jake Chung, Staff writer
The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) today condemned the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) after the Czech officials confirmed that Chinese agents had surveilled Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) during her visit to Prague in March last year. Czech Military Intelligence director Petr Bartovsky yesterday said that Chinese operatives had attempted to create the conditions to carry out a demonstrative incident involving Hsiao, going as far as to plan a collision with her car. Hsiao was vice president-elect at the time. The MAC said that it has requested an explanation and demanded a public apology from Beijing. The CCP has repeatedly ignored the desires
Many Chinese spouses required to submit proof of having renounced their Chinese household registration have either completed the process or provided affidavits ahead of the June 30 deadline, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said on Thursday. Of the 12,146 people required to submit the proof, 5,534 had done so as of Wednesday, MAC deputy head and spokesperson Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) said. Another 2,572 people who met conditions for exemption or deferral from submitting proof of deregistration — such as those with serious illnesses or injuries — have submitted affidavits instead, he said. “As long as individuals are willing to cooperate with the legal
The Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant’s license has expired and it cannot simply be restarted, the Executive Yuan said today, ahead of national debates on the nuclear power referendum. The No. 2 reactor at the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County was disconnected from the nation’s power grid and completely shut down on May 17, the day its license expired. The government would prioritize people’s safety and conduct necessary evaluations and checks if there is a need to extend the service life of the reactor, Executive Yuan spokeswoman Michelle Lee (李慧芝) told a news conference. Lee said that the referendum would read: “Do
The Ministry of Environment yesterday held a seminar in Taipei for experts from Taiwan and Japan to exchange their experiences on the designs and development of public toilets. Japan Toilet Association chairman Kohei Yamamoto said that he was impressed with the eco-toilet set up at Daan Forest Park, adding that Japan still faces issues regarding public restrooms despite the progress it made over the past decades. For example, an all-gender toilet was set up in Kabukicho in Tokyo’s Shinjuku District several years ago, but it caused a public backlash and was rebuilt into traditional men’s and women’s toilets, he said. Japan Toilet Association