In the past two, three years, I have visited Taiwan’s streets and alleys. In traditional markets, roadside stalls and eateries, I often see the small children that are busy helping their families do business. They come home from school and write their homework on oil-strewn tables and the fading twilight sun. When there are many customers, they give up their tables to accommodate the guests.
When I look at them, my heart is filled with sadness and emotion. They don’t have the most basic needs — not even a table. However, with their own methods, they continue to pursue their futures.
I believe that in this world, all parents have hopes and dreams for their children. These dreams should not be limited by the disparity between urban and rural areas or the rich and the poor. So I tell myself that we have a set of responsibilities to these children that we cannot escape from.
It is a sense of responsibility like this that has led me to decide to contest the Democratic Progressive Party’s presidential nomination for 2012. I have decided to fight alongside the party’s elders and with the Taiwanese people: To use all my power to give the next generation a renewed trust, so they can continue to hold hope for the country and have a proud vision of their future.
When my father was alive, he never liked that I took this political path.
He told me once that: “You don’t have to compete with other people. If someone doesn’t want to do it or can’t do it, then you can step in.”
Today’s decision isn’t to compete with someone or to prove anything. This decision is about a sense of responsibility that has to be upheld and I must bravely carry forward this destiny.
In the past three years since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) inauguration, many unprecedented events have taken place for Taiwan, which have continuously impacted the public’s collective emotions. When Chinese officials come, our police hurriedly take national flags from their own people, compressing the multiple voices of Taiwan into one.
When our young athletes go overseas for competitions — to fight for the pride of Taiwan — they have to endure unequal treatment, resulting in incidents they force them to sit on the taekwondo mat wronged and crying. Our citizens are also sent by the Philippines to China, without reason, and not even a single word of apology is uttered. The government can’t explain these incidents and were at a loss for what to do.
What our young people must be at a loss to understand is why democracy and freedom — achieved through the blood and tears of the past generation — can be easily pushed aside because of our relationship with China. Why does this government continue to feel good about itself, even when our national dignity is trampled upon even to the point that people can no longer accept? Why must the government continue to remain ambiguous when dealing with the issue of our sovereignty, even when our own recognition of this piece of land is so oblivious?
For a long time, it was the sense of collective existence that brought Taiwan together even in the most difficult of times. However, now, when the people’s collective feelings are constantly hurt, this government doesn’t seem to care. It doesn’t employ any means to repair these broken feelings.
We are not asking for much — all we want is a government that cares like we do. This country must be able to give its next generation a sense of pride — and not heartache.
My friends, we all know that to create this kind of country, it will take more than an ordinary road. By the same thinking, the DPP will, on the road back to governance, have to undergo unprecedented difficulty. However, we must follow the voice of Taiwan — we have no other choice. We must convince the people to believe that Taiwan actually has another road: a different road.
Many people have pinned their hopes for this country on the shoulders of the DPP and the party must positively reflect this amount of stirring optimism. Taiwan desperately needs a political choice away from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and we must become that strong and viable choice.
Translated by Vincent Y. Chao
‘DENIAL DEFENSE’: The US would increase its military presence with uncrewed ships, and submarines, while boosting defense in the Indo-Pacific, a Pete Hegseth memo said The US is reorienting its military strategy to focus primarily on deterring a potential Chinese invasion of Taiwan, a memo signed by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth showed. The memo also called on Taiwan to increase its defense spending. The document, known as the “Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance,” was distributed this month and detailed the national defense plans of US President Donald Trump’s administration, an article in the Washington Post said on Saturday. It outlines how the US can prepare for a potential war with China and defend itself from threats in the “near abroad,” including Greenland and the Panama
The High Prosecutors’ Office yesterday withdrew an appeal against the acquittal of a former bank manager 22 years after his death, marking Taiwan’s first instance of prosecutors rendering posthumous justice to a wrongfully convicted defendant. Chu Ching-en (諸慶恩) — formerly a manager at the Taipei branch of BNP Paribas — was in 1999 accused by Weng Mao-chung (翁茂鍾), then-president of Chia Her Industrial Co, of forging a request for a fixed deposit of US$10 million by I-Hwa Industrial Co, a subsidiary of Chia Her, which was used as collateral. Chu was ruled not guilty in the first trial, but was found guilty
A wild live dugong was found in Taiwan for the first time in 88 years, after it was accidentally caught by a fisher’s net on Tuesday in Yilan County’s Fenniaolin (粉鳥林). This is the first sighting of the species in Taiwan since 1937, having already been considered “extinct” in the country and considered as “vulnerable” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. A fisher surnamed Chen (陳) went to Fenniaolin to collect the fish in his netting, but instead caught a 3m long, 500kg dugong. The fisher released the animal back into the wild, not realizing it was an endangered species at
DEADLOCK: As the commission is unable to forum a quorum to review license renewal applications, the channel operators are not at fault and can air past their license date The National Communications Commission (NCC) yesterday said that the Public Television Service (PTS) and 36 other television and radio broadcasters could continue airing, despite the commission’s inability to meet a quorum to review their license renewal applications. The licenses of PTS and the other channels are set to expire between this month and June. The National Communications Commission Organization Act (國家通訊傳播委員會組織法) stipulates that the commission must meet the mandated quorum of four to hold a valid meeting. The seven-member commission currently has only three commissioners. “We have informed the channel operators of the progress we have made in reviewing their license renewal applications, and