The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) dismissed an allegation over the weekend that its decision not to hold an administrative hearing on a controversial plan to build the country’s eighth naphtha cracker on coastal wetlands in central Taiwan was illegal.
The private investment project initiated by Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co (KPTC) does not require approval from the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Industrial Development Bureau, bureau director-general Woody Duh (杜紫軍) said in a telephone interview.
“Since no approval is required, there is no need for the ministry to hold an administrative hearing,” he said.
His remarks came one day after a professor demanded that the ministry hold an administrative hearing on the investment project in line with the Administrative Procedure Act (行政程序法).
More than 1,200 university professors and academics have expressed opposition to the project and on Aug. 3 released a joint petition stating their objections. They vowed to demonstrate next month if the ministry fails to organize an -administrative hearing.
The ministry said that it organized a public hearing on the environmental impact of the project in February in Changhua County, where the plant is to be located.
The Environmental Protection Administration is now conducting an assessment of the environmental impact of the proposed plant, it said. KPTC, a joint venture by the state-owned oil refinery CPC Corp, Taiwan and several private companies, plans to invest up to NT$400 billion (US$12.66 billion) to construct a 4,000-hectare petrochemical complex on Changhua County’s coastal wetlands near the estuary of the Jhuoshui River (濁水溪).
Environmentalists strongly oppose the project, saying that it will hurt the area’s ecosystem, which includes migratory birds, fiddler crabs, mudskippers, mud shrimps and the almost-extinct Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin.
The ministry said the project is would generate revenue of about NT$460 billion and create 18,000 jobs directly and 357,000 jobs indirectly. The bureau said it supports the establishment of the plant to replace the aging fifth naphtha cracker on environmental grounds.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS