To resolve the recent imbalance between production and marketing of Taiwanese bananas, the Council of Agriculture (COA) is seeking more help from the Chinese market. Between January and April, however, China purchased less than 2 tonnes of bananas. It bought 21.5 tonnes last year and none in 2008.
This stands in contrast with Japan’s steady, long-term purchases of Taiwanese bananas. It purchased 8,255 tonnes in 2008, 7,983 tonnes last year, and almost 2,994 tonnes between January and April this year.
Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office in 2008, his government has tried to sell Taiwanese fruit to China. Critics, however, say China doesn’t buy anything unless it will benefit Beijing’s propaganda efforts, calling such purchases China “abnormal trading.”
PHOTO: YOU MING-CHIN, TAIPEI TIMES
Farmers have also expressed concern that while the government makes every effort to target the Chinese market, it ignores the Japanese market.
Statistics show that in 2007, Taiwan exported more than 17,200 tonnes of bananas to Japan, while the volume fell by half in the past two years.
Taiwanese farmers usually see Japan as a high-price market. Taiwanese bananas sold in China go for half what they would bring in Japan.
The Agriculture and Food Agency said the cost, insurance and freight (CIF) price of Taiwanese bananas to Japan was NT$61.9 per kilogram last week, while the CIF price of bananas to China was NT$27.6. Farmers, however, say the agency subsidizes exports to China through the Taiwan Provincial Fruit Marketing Cooperative and the Taipei Agricultural Products Marketing Co, which buys the bananas from farmers for NT$15 per kilogram.
Pingtung County farmer Sun Kuo-liang (孫國樑) said the purchase price was not always NT$15, as some businesspeople buy his bananas for NT$7 per kilogram.
Pingting County Councilor Lee Ching-sheng (李清聖) said he was told by a banana farmer late last month that the wholesale price of Pingtung bananas had plummeted to NT$6 per kilo, a price so low that farmers cannot even harvest them for sale because it is cheaper to cut them down for pig feed.
Critics say it is impractical for the Chinese government to purchase large amounts of bananas from Taiwan since Hainan Province is also a major producer of bananas, so any purchases that Beijing makes are mostly symbolic.
Wu Ming-ming (吳明敏), an honorary professor at National Chung Hsing University, said when there was a glut of Taiwanese oranges at the beginning of this year, China announced it would buy Taiwanese oranges. However, the quantities were much lower than expected, while the price was also much lower than average price on the Taiwanese market.
Any Chinese purchases of bananas might be a repetition, he said.
When tariffs and the value-added tax are added onto administrative and marketing expenses, a reasonable price for a farmer selling bananas is more than NT$40 per kilo, he said. However, farmers are selling their crop for half that price now, so without any government subsidies, the farmers may not turn a profit.
Chen Shih-hsiung (陳世雄), chairman of the Association of Taiwan Organic Agriculture Promotion, said China’s fruit purchases have been superficial, adding that the Ma government should focus its efforts on the Japanese and European markets.
Unfortunately, the government is placing all its hopes on China, as it moves to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, he said.
Taiwan is losing its international competitiveness because of the government’s reliance on China, he said.
Agriculture and Food Agency Secretary-General Hsu Han-ching (許漢卿) defended the small scale of Chinese purchases of Taiwanese bananas, saying the lack of sales channels and relatively high prices meant exports were not a high as expected.
The drop in exports to Japan was the result of higher prices caused by typhoons cutting into production in the past two years.
Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Wu-hsiung (陳武雄) has been criticized for making too many overseas trips at a time when the nation’s farmers are hurting.
Chen has traveled abroad four times in the past five months. He accompanied Ma on overseas visits in January and March, visited Holland in April and went to the Dominican Republic earlier this month as Ma’s special envoy to a Haiti aid summit.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Pan Meng-an (潘孟安) said Chen’s priorities were out of line and he remained oblivious to the plight of Taiwanese farmers.
National Dong Hwa University professor Shih Cheng-feng (施正鋒) said that just because agricultural affairs do not involve death or injuries does not mean Chen should make frequent overseas trips.
Farmers’ movement activist Yang Ju-men (楊儒門) also questioned Chen’s frequent absences.
Chen’s office director Ge Chao-jia (葛兆佳) defended the trips, saying that Chen had made three of the four at the request of the president, while the trip to Holland was at the invitation of the Dutch agricultural department.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY CNA
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang