Jennifer, mother of one and expecting another baby next month, has been working almost non-stop in the 11 years since she finished her studies and entered the “real world.”
Like many of her friends who are mothers or mothers-to-be, Jennifer doesn’t dare take a long break to prepare for the birth and take care of her newborn afterwards, even if her company allows her to take the time she is legally entitled to.
“Even if the company allows me to take such long breaks, I would not do so, because who knows what will happen when I come back?” she said.
The Council of Labor Affairs has recently been considering an amendment that would allow female workers to take a maximum of one year of unpaid leave to prepare for a birth. This period would allow a pregnant worker to take measures to avoid a miscarriage or receive treatment for pregnancy-related discomfort and illnesses.
Pregnant women would have to present medical proof from their doctors recommending a set period of rest in order to claim the time-off allowance.
The council’s proposal, however, has faced widespread criticism from labor and business groups alike. Labor groups and working mothers such as Jennifer doubt the plan will have any real effect because women who fear losing their jobs while on leave end up choosing not to take such long breaks.
Although the Act for Gender Equality in Employment (性別工作平等法) prohibits employers from discriminating against mothers or treating mothers unfairly in the workplace, women like Jennifer still worry that while they are on their long breaks, their employer will find someone else to replace them — permanently.
National Federation of Independent Trade Unions (NAFITU) president Chu Wei-li (朱維立) said that although he is glad to see the council was mulling such a proposal, he’s doubtful the plan would really work.
“Even if pregnant women are allowed to take unpaid pregnancy leave, some of them might insist on going to work despite the risk of miscarriage because if they don’t work, they don’t have an income,” he said.
Chu said that without measures to ensure that women would not need to worry about their jobs or lost income, the plan might look good, but have no real effect.
While the Act stipulates that employers cannot discriminate on gender, if authorities do not step up efforts to implement the regulations and inspect businesses and punish violators, then the Act is merely “an illusion.”
Business groups and employers, on the other hand, said replacing a worker who takes such long breaks would be costly.
“Businesses need a certain amount of time to train new employees, even those who have some work experience. It is difficult for some businesses to afford the salaries of both the replacement and the working mother who comes back to work after giving birth,” said Paul Wang (王振保), secretary-general of the National Association of Small and Medium Enterprises.
Wang’s sentiments were reflective of many individual business owners who, while generally agreeing that women are as valuable in the workplace as men, may not like the cost-benefit equation that the plan would inevitably bring about.
Edward, who runs his own international trade business, said that if the plan was put into effect, he might reconsider certain promotion opportunities for pregnant employees.
“It’s difficult for me to admit this, but I do have some concerns about whether an expectant mother who takes such a long time off is able to handle the heavier workload and responsibilities that come with a promotion,” he said.
Edward is not alone in thinking this way. His hesitation highlights one of the biggest challenges working mothers face, with or without social welfare legislation. Although pregnancy leave is intended to benefit pregnant workers, without supportive measures to back up the plan, women will be the ones forced to pay for their — and society’s — lifestyle choices.
CAUTION: Based on intelligence from the nation’s security agencies, MOFA has cautioned Taiwanese travelers about heightened safety risks in China-friendly countries The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday urged Taiwanese to be aware of their safety when traveling abroad, especially in countries that are friendly to China. China in June last year issued 22 guidelines that allow its courts to try in absentia and sentence to death so-called “diehard” Taiwanese independence activists, even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction in Taiwan. Late last month, a senior Chinese official gave closed-door instructions to state security units to implement the guidelines in countries friendly to China, a government memo and a senior Taiwan security official said, based on information gathered by Taiwan’s intelligence agency. The
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world’s largest contract chipmaker, said yesterday that it is looking to hire 8,000 people this year, at a time when the tech giant is expanding production capacity to maintain its lead over competitors. To attract talent, TSMC would launch a large-scale recruitment campaign on campuses across Taiwan, where a newly recruited engineer with a master’s degree could expect to receive an average salary of NT$2.2 million (US$60,912), which is much higher than the 2023 national average of NT$709,000 for those in the same category, according to government statistics. TSMC, which accounted for more than 60 percent
The National Immigration Agency (NIA) said yesterday that it will revoke the dependent-based residence permit of a Chinese social media influencer who reportedly “openly advocated for [China’s] unification through military force” with Taiwan. The Chinese national, identified by her surname Liu (劉), will have her residence permit revoked in accordance with Article 14 of the “Measures for the permission of family- based residence, long-term residence and settlement of people from the Mainland Area in the Taiwan Area,” the NIA said in a news release. The agency explained it received reports that Liu made “unifying Taiwan through military force” statements on her online
Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢), a Taiwanese businessman and deputy convener of the nation’s National Climate Change Committee, said yesterday that “electrical power is national power” and nuclear energy is “very important to Taiwan.” Tung made the remarks, suggesting that his views do not align with the country’s current official policy of phasing out nuclear energy, at a forum organized by the Taiwan People’s Party titled “Challenges and Prospects of Taiwan’s AI Industry and Energy Policy.” “Taiwan is currently pursuing industries with high added- value and is developing vigorously, and this all requires electricity,” said the chairman
RSS