Washington’s latest arms sales proves the US’ commitment to Taiwan’s security but the “China factor” was still a major deterrent for the US in selling Taipei more advanced defensive weapons such as F-16 fighter jets, observers in Taipei said.
On Friday, US President Barack Obama’s administration announced its plan to sell US$6.4 billion in weapons to Taiwan, including 60 Blackhawk helicopters and defensive missiles. Missing from the list were F-16s and feasibility plans for diesel submarines that Taiwan had requested. Asked about the reason for their absence, the US in a statement said it continues to evaluate Taiwan’s defense needs.
A source familiar with Taiwan’s diplomatic corps said the US purposely avoided making a definitive statement because of the possibility of future sales that hinge on the China-US relationship.
As with previous US arms sales to Taiwan, Beijing protested, saying the US had interfered with “domestic affairs” and that such actions harm Sino-US ties.
In 2008, shortly after Washington approved a US$6.5 million arms deal with Taipei, Beijing suspended military talks with the US.
“The US fully anticipated China’s protest and is closely watching to see if Beijing goes beyond the level of protest it displayed in the past,” said Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), political science professor at National Cheng Chi University and a former Taiwanese representative to the US.
Although the notification quelled worries that the US was becoming more China-leaning at the expense of ties with Taiwan, the exclusion of the fighter jets and submarine plans shows that the “China factor” was still important, he said.
“F-16s are a very politically symbolic item. But if the US consistently refuses to sell Taiwan the items, it will put Taiwan at a disadvantage and might cast doubts over the US’ commitment to Taiwan’s security as outlined in the Taiwan Relations Act [TRA] and the Six Assurances,” Wu said.
Lai I-chung (賴怡忠), a researcher at Taiwan Thinktank and a former Democratic Progressive Party official, said the US’ refusal to sell Taiwan some military hardware is a reflection of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) failed diplomacy and that the “mutual trust” between Taipei and Washington touted by Ma, was one-sided.
“If the Taiwan-US relationship was truly as excellent as Ma claims and Taiwan was no longer viewed as a ‘troublemaker’ by the US, then why does the US continue to place China’s sentiments above Taiwan’s defense needs,” he said.
He said the TRA obliges the US to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself. Washington’s unwillingness to even consider selling Taiwan F-16s is contrary to the spirit of the TRA, he said, adding that if Ma was so confident about the strength of Taiwan-US ties, he should challenge Washington on this point.
Former foreign minister Cheng Chien-jen (程建仁), taking a more upbeat approach, said future sales of F-16s and submarine plans remain possible as Washington has never categorically denied the request and because China’s military threat is real.
“Those items are more politically sensitive than anything else Taiwan requested and this is why the US must handle the issue carefully, but it was not an absolute no. Keep in mind that the original request was pitched in 2002 and most items in the latest announcement were approved by the Bush administration. The reality is that now, the US needs China’s cooperation more than ever,” he said.
The US’s rising dependency on Chinese help on issues such as counter-terrorism, global warming and North Korea, coupled with the cross-strait detente, all contribute to the US reluctance to sell Taiwan certain weapons system, he said.
Tamkang University Graduate Institute of American Studies Professor Alexander Huang (黃介正) said Friday’s announcement was “long overdue” and was not surprised that fighter jets and the submarine design work were off the list.
“To many people in China and some in Washington, F-16s are considered an advanced system, henceforth it more politically complicated and sensitive than other items,” he said.
Civil society groups yesterday protested outside the Legislative Yuan, decrying Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) efforts to pass three major bills that they said would seriously harm Taiwan’s democracy, and called to oust KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁). It was the second night of the three-day “Bluebird wintertime action” protests in Taipei, with organizers announcing that 8,000 people attended. Organized by Taiwan Citizen Front, the Economic Democracy Union (EDU) and a coalition of civil groups, about 6,000 people began a demonstration in front of KMT party headquarters in Taipei on Wednesday, organizers said. For the third day, the organizers asked people to assemble
Taipei is participating in Osaka’s Festival of Lights this year, with a 3m-tall bubble tea light installation symbolizing Taiwan’s bubble tea culture. The installation is designed as a bubble tea cup and features illustrations of Taipei’s iconic landmarks, such as Taipei 101, the Red House and North Gate, as well as soup dumplings and the matchmaking deity the Old Man Under the Moon (月下老人), affectionately known as Yue Lao (月老). Taipei and Osaka have collaborated closely on tourism and culture since Taipei first participated in the festival in 2018, the Taipei City Department of Information and Tourism said. In February, Osaka represented
POOR IMPLEMENTATION: Teachers welcomed the suspension, saying that the scheme disrupted school schedules, quality of learning and the milk market A policy to offer free milk to all school-age children nationwide is to be suspended next year due to multiple problems arising from implementation of the policy, the Executive Yuan announced yesterday. The policy was designed to increase the calcium intake of school-age children in Taiwan by drinking milk, as more than 80 percent drink less than 240ml per day. The recommended amount is 480ml. It was also implemented to help Taiwanese dairy farmers counter competition from fresh milk produced in New Zealand, which is to be imported to Taiwan tariff-free next year when the Agreement Between New Zealand and
IDENTITY SHIFT: Asked to choose to identify as either Taiwanese or Chinese, 83.3 percent of respondents chose Taiwanese, while 8.4 percent chose Chinese An overwhelming majority of Taiwanese, 71.5 percent, think that Taiwan should compete in international competitions under the name “Taiwan,” a Taiwan Brain Trust survey published yesterday showed. Referring to Taiwan’s victory last month at the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12, the survey results showed that 89.1 percent of respondents said that Taiwan’s exceptional performance in sporting competitions furthers national unity. Only 18.8 percent of respondents supported Taiwanese teams’ continued use of the name “Chinese Taipei” in international sporting competitions, the survey showed. Among Taiwan’s leading political parties, the name “Team Taiwan” was supported by 91.1 percent of self-identified Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) supporters,
RSS