Tue, Sep 15, 2009 page3

• Prosecutors to appeal sentences

  DISPROPORTIONATE Prosecutors said it was not fair for Huang Jui-ching to have to pay 67 times more than Tsai Ming-che to avoid serving time when she was less involved

  • By Shelley Huang and Ko Shu-ling / STAFF REPORTERS
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  District prosecutors said they would appeal the sentences given former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) daughter-in-law, Huang Jui-ching (黃睿靚), and family friend Tsai Ming-che (蔡銘哲) because the fines were disproportionate to their involvement in Chen’s corruption cases.

  Chen and his wife, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍), were found guilty of receiving kickbacks from a development company to pave the way for the construction of the Hsinchu Science Park by purchasing a plot of land in Taoyuan County from the company at a price prosecutors said was unreasonably high.

  Former Hsinchu Science Park head James Lee (李界木) and Wu’s friend Tsai Ming-che were found guilty of pocketing part of the money and transferring kickbacks to accounts held by Chen family members.

  

  Two women pray for good luck for former president Chen Shui-bian outside the Taipei Detention Center yesterday. Chen has been held at the center since last December. He was convicted on corrupion charges on Friday but has said he would appeal.

  PHOTO: CNA

  Lee was sentenced to six years in prison and was deprived of his civil rights for three years. Tsai was sentenced to two years in prison, but could receive five years probation instead if he pays the treasury NT$3 million (US$92,000).

  Huang was sentenced to one year and eight months and fined NT$150 million on money laundering charges. If she wants to receive probation in lieu of serving time, she must pay the treasury NT$200 million.

  Prosecutors said they would appeal Huang and Tsai’s sentences because Huang would have to pay 67 times more than Tsai when it was clear that Tsai was heavily involved in the case while Huang was only partly involved. This was a violation of the principle of proportionality, prosecutors said.

  Meanwhile, Chen’s office yesterday said the former president had asked his lawyers to file an appeal but that he would not attend the hearings if his appeals were not handled in a fair and transparent manner.

  Chen’s office issued a statement citing an anonymous source at the High Court as saying that after Judge Chou Chan-chun (周占春) released Chen from detention last year, Taiwan High Court President Huang Shui-tong (黃水通) asked Judge Chen Hsiao-pei (陳筱佩) to determine whether Chou should be removed from the former president’s cases even though Chen Hsiao-pei was abroad at the time.

  “In other words, it was a clear case of administrative interference in a trial for the High Court president to designate a certain judge to handle a particular case,” the statement said.

  If the High Court engages in such “petty maneuvering” and abuse of authority again, the former president would again consider refusing to attend hearings or remain silent in protest, the statement said.

  Chen Shui-bian remained silent at his pre-trial hearings, staring in June, to protest what he described as an unfair judicial system. He also relinquished his right to call witnesses or speak in his defense, saying they were unnecessary because he was innocent.

  He broke his silence at the end of his trial in late July when he reiterated that the switching of judges last year was unconstitutional and that there had been no procedural justice in his trial.

  Others have also claimed the switch was politically motivated. Some legal experts also said the decision to merge the trials had violated judicial procedures.

  Chen Shui-bian’s office has asked the Council of Grand Justices to rule on the legitimacy of his pre-trial detention and the switching of judges from Chou to Tsai Shou-hsun (蔡守訓).

  Taiwan High Court spokesperson Wen Yao-yuan (溫耀源) said yesterday that Chen Hsiao-pei had been selected from a random drawing, in accordance with the law.

  As for which high court judge would preside over Chen Shui-bian’s appeal, Wen said the High Court would conduct a random drawing in accordance with the law and that the entire process would be transparent.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 3

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 4

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 5

    Eric Chu, 2 others to be questioned for leading illegal assembly last week