While government officials called the agreement signed between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) on Nov. 4 as “a big step forward” in cross-strait trade relations, industry representatives said the results were not quite what they had expected.
Taiwan appeared to benefit in terms of cross-strait sea transport in the recent SEF-ARATS talks, they said. Once the agreement takes effect, vessels from Taiwan will be allowed to navigate directly to 63 Chinese sea and river ports.
Companies will also be exempt from paying business and income tax revenue derived from direct cross-strait shipping.
Under the terms of the agreement, vessels registered to shipping companies in Taiwan, Hong Kong and China can engage in direct cross-strait transport of passengers or cargo.
Flag-of-convenience (FOC) vessels, or those registered in another country, will also be allowed to participate in the direct shipping service, but will be restricted to those companies already engaged in offshore shipping center transport, cross-strait third-territory container line transport and the transportation of sand and gravel. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) said that the nation had 477 registered FOCs. The agreement only applies to 16 of them, or about 3 percent.
Meanwhile, qualifications outlined in the agreement essentially ruled out the nation’s bulk shipping carriers and FOCs operating with other countries. Some have even speculated that the measure is meant to encourage more shipping firms in Taiwan to switch their registrations to Hong Kong instead.
The government also sees the plans to increase cross-strait chartered flights as a breakthrough. The number of chartered flights will be increased from 36 per week to 108 per week, with each country allowed 54 flights. Services will also no longer be restricted to weekends.
But Tony Su (蘇宏義), chairman of the Taipei Airliners Association, said before the SEF-ARATS talks that the nation needed at least 84 weekly cross-strait charter flights if it aimed to have 3,000 Chinese tourists visit daily.
And though China now has 21 airports available for cross-strait charter flights service, Taiwan’s carriers are only planning to fly a few profitable routes — such as flights to Shanghai, which are capped at 20 per week.
The talks between SEF Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) also made it possible for both countries to launch anticipated chartered cargo flight services, starting with 60 flights per month.
However, what most of the nation’s carriers really wanted was to allow the passenger jets to carry freight, which is seen as a lucrative service. So far, both Taiwan and China have only agreed that passenger jets can carry airmail and packages sent by Chinese and Taiwanese postal services.
Representatives from the transportation and travel industries generally see resuming a dialogue between the two sides of the Strait as a positive development, though they do not necessarily agree with every detail of the negotiations.
China now “has all the bargaining chips,” they say. Whether it is about limitations on flights to big cities like Shanghai, the number of Chinese provinces from which residents are allowed to visit Taiwan, or the number of travel agencies authorized to organize group tours to Taiwan, they say China is in charge.
But they also have doubts about the ability of Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) officials to accurately represent them in the negotiations and defend their interests when discussing technical transportation issues.
Yao Ta-kuang (姚大光), chairman of the Travel Agent Association suggested that MAC officials could have used more leverage in the negotiations.
“Taiwan has allowed approximately 5 million Taiwanese to visit China since it lifted the restrictions two decades ago,” he said. “With the number of cross-strait charter flights that are currently available [36 flights], Chinese tourists who are able to come are only one-tenth the number of Taiwanese going to China. There’s no comparison.”
One travel service operator, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described the delegates from Taiwan as a “loosely formed team” and said they were dealing with experienced Chinese negotiators who participated in the first SEF-ARATS talk in 1993 in Singapore and subsequent talks in Shanghai in 1998.
Industry representatives were also upset at what they called the failure to include certain details in the cross-strait agreement.
Despite the downsides, MOTC officials said the agreement had drawn the attention of international sea liners and some have expressed an interest in registering their ships in Taiwan and setting up branches here.
A decision to describe a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Singapore’s Taiwan policy as “erroneous” was made because the city-state has its own “one China policy” and has not followed Beijing’s “one China principle,” Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Tien Chung-kwang (田中光) said yesterday. It has been a longstanding practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to speak on other countries’ behalf concerning Taiwan, Tien said. The latest example was a statement issued by the PRC after a meeting between Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC summit
Taiwan’s passport ranked 34th in the world, with access to 141 visa-free destinations, according to the latest update to the Henley Passport Index released today. The index put together by Henley & Partners ranks 199 passports globally based on the number of destinations holders can access without a visa out of 227, and is updated monthly. The 141 visa-free destinations for Taiwanese passport holders are a slight decrease from last year, when holders had access to 145 destinations. Botswana and Columbia are among the countries that have recently ended visa-free status for Taiwanese after “bowing to pressure from the Chinese government,” the Ministry
HEALTHCARE: Following a 2022 Constitutional Court ruling, Taiwanese traveling overseas for six months would no longer be able to suspend their insurance Measures allowing people to suspend National Health Insurance (NHI) services if they plan to leave the country for six months would be abolished starting Dec. 23, NHIA Director-General Shih Chung-liang (石崇良) said yesterday. The decision followed the Constitutional Court’s ruling in 2022 that the regulation was unconstitutional and that it would invalidate the regulation automatically unless the NHIA amended it to conform with the Constitution. The agency would amend the regulations to remove the articles and sections that allow the suspension of NHI services, and also introduce provisional clauses for those who suspended their NHI services before Dec. 23, Shih said. According to
Minister of Labor Ho Pei-shan (何佩珊) yesterday apologized after the suicide of a civil servant earlier this month and announced that a supervisor accused of workplace bullying would be demoted. On Nov. 4, a 39-year-old information analyst at the Workforce Development Agency’s (WDA) northern branch, which covers greater Taipei and Keelung, as well as Yilan, Lienchiang and Kinmen counties, was found dead in their office. WDA northern branch director Hsieh Yi-jung (謝宜容), who has been accused of involvement in workplace bullying, would be demoted to a nonsupervisory position, Ho told a news conference in Taipei. WDA Director-General Tsai Meng-liang (蔡孟良) said he would
RSS