Wed, Oct 29, 2008 page2

• Ambient radiation levels around Taiwan normal

  NATIONWIDE CHECK Three Atomic Energy Council employees bicycled around Taiwan to check radiation levels, reporting that all of the readings were quite low

  • By Meggie Lu / STAFF REPORTER
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Most radiation that humans come into contact with exists naturally in the environment and is harmless to human health, the Atomic Energy Council (AEC) said yesterday, adding that people should not be overly concerned about radiation hazards in their daily lives.

  Last month, three AEC employees spent 10 days traveling around the country on their bikes. Five flat tires, two falls into gutters and some 300 or more radiation checks later, the trio returned to Taipei with data showing that radiation levels nationwide are within safety levels, AEC Radiation Monitoring Center director Huang Ching-chung (黃景鐘) said.

  “Two-thirds of the radiation people experience in life exists in the environment naturally, while another third comes from medical treatments such as X-rays or MRI scans,” Huang said.

  

  Three Atomic Energy Council employees, left to right, Tsai Yu-sung, Sun Ching-yeh and Hsu Chih-fei, pose for photographs at the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Taipei County yesterday. The trio recently finished traveling around Taiwan on their bikes to check radiation levels around the country.

  PHOTO: CNA

  Radiation coming from nuclear plants or other nuclear devices combined contributes to less than 1 percent of total radiation, he added.

  What is also important to know is that radiation — measured in alpha, beta or gamma rays — produces the same effect on human bodies despite its source, Huang said.

  For example, cosmic gamma rays would have the same effect on the body as gamma rays produced by a nuclear plant, he said.

  In terms of the radiation levels measured by the three bikers, “the highest gamma ray dose was 0.050 microsieverts per hour (μSv/h), measured on the Northern Cross-Island Highway (北橫公路), while the lowest was 0.023 μSv/h around Hualien,” Huang said.

  “However, even if one looks at the ‘double’ amount, in reality they are both far below the 0.2 μSv/h safety level published by the AEC, and the differences should be regarded as insignificant and ascribed to natural variations,” he said.

  The same conclusion also applies to areas to which the bikers did not trek, such as high mountains, where radiation levels are naturally stronger.

  “Three major sources contribute to natural ionizing radiation in the environment — cosmic rays, gamma rays from the earth and sources in the atmosphere including radon gas,” Huang said.

  Cosmic rays are stronger in higher latitudes, thereby strongest at the North Pole, Huang said, adding that high altitude regions atop mountains like Alishan are also affected more strongly by the rays.

  But as the nation as a whole has a low level of radiation, the place with the “highest radiation” is not scientifically meaningful, and the public should not panic and avoid hiking even if the radiation level is above 0.2μSv/h, Huang said,

  Citing the world’s four areas with the strongest levels of natural background radiation — Brazil’s Guarapari, China’s Yangjiang, India’s Kerala and Iran’s Ramsar — Huang said that while Guarapari is a prime tourist destination drawing crowds of visitors with its natural mud baths, major studies conducted in Yangjiang have found that nearby residents suffer from no long-term health maladies because of the radiation.

  “The dose of natural background radiation in those places is hundreds of times higher than the 0.2 μSv/h level,” Huang said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Bologna advance to face AC Milan in Coppa final

  • 2

    Bukele proposes prisoner swap with Maduro

  • 3

    Wild’s top line too much for Vegas Golden Knights

  • 4

    HK, Macau residency rules tightened

  • 5

    Eric Chu, 2 others to be questioned for leading illegal assembly last week