The Assembly and Parade Assembly Law (集會遊行法) limits freedom of expression for minority groups and should be abolished. That was the view of civic groups who were supporting two activists indicted for violating the law by demonstrating outside the Taiwan High Court yesterday.
“The Assembly and Parade Law was adopted after martial law was lifted as a tool for the government to limit freedom of expression,” Huang Chia-ping (黃佳平), a spokesman for the Alliance Against the Parade and Assembly Law, told representatives of several civic groups gathered outside the court building.
They were there supporting National Cheng-kung University Taiwanese literature professor Chung Hsiu-mei (鍾秀梅) and National Taiwan University student Pan Hsin-jung (潘欣榮). Chung and Pan were indicted for violation of the law because a demonstration they led in front of the Ministry of Education against the privatization of the education sector and increases in the cost of tuition two years ago exceeded the approved time.
The two were originally declared innocent by the Taipei District Court, but prosecutors chose to appeal. The Taiwan High Court upheld the innocent verdict yesterday.
“Minority non-governmental organizations are unable to get their voices heard through the mainstream media, taking our message to the street is an important way for us to get it across to the public,” Huang said.
While the police are supposed to remain neutral and simply maintain order during demonstrations, “they often serve as a tool for the state to repress minority groups,” Huang said.
Pan agreed.
“We wanted to speak out, but the state, through the Assembly and Parade Law, wants us to shut up,” Pan said after walking out of the court building a free man.
“There are many other laws that could regulate assemblies and parades,” said Tsai Chi-hsun (蔡季勳), secretary-general of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, who also supports abolishing the Assembly and Parade Law. “The Road Traffic Management and Punishment Law [道路交通管理處罰條例] and the Social Order Law [社會秩序維護法] could be used — just to name just two.”
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
Taiwanese celebrities Hank Chen (陳漢典) and Lulu Huang (黃路梓茵) announced yesterday that they are planning to marry. Huang announced and posted photos of their engagement to her social media pages yesterday morning, joking that the pair were not just doing marketing for a new show, but “really getting married.” “We’ve decided to spend all of our future happy and hilarious moments together,” she wrote. The announcement, which was later confirmed by the talent agency they share, appeared to come as a surprise even to those around them, with veteran TV host Jacky Wu (吳宗憲) saying he was “totally taken aback” by the news. Huang,
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
RSS