There is a way to help a nation develop clean energy sources that would conserve the environment without sacrificing economic gains, and with some policy framework tweaking, the scheme could work for Taiwan, said Stefan Schurig, climate and energy director of the World Future Council.
The policy tool he was referring to is called the “Feed-in Tariff (FIT),” a scheme that has worked in Germany and 40 other countries since the late 1970s, successfully boosting the speed of technological development for renewable energy while also providing jobs and stimulating GDP growth.
“[Because of FIT], Germany has become a global leader in solar energy, owning 55 percent of the world’s solar cell panels,” he said during a visit to Taipei last month.
PHOTO: HSIEH FENG-CHIU, TAIPEI TIMES
Schurig came to Taiwan to attend a climate change hearing hosted by the e-parliament, a forum that saw legislators from across the region gather to discuss policy and technologies capable of combating global warming.
The idea behind FIT is simple, Schurig said.
“The government sets a favorable price for all energy generated by clean sources, such as wind and solar power, then mandates all grid operators [power line owners] to purchase them, from clean energy providers, at those prices,” he said.
In other words, “however much electricity a windmill owner can put out, grid operators are mandated by law to purchase them, and at a good, set price,” he said.
Another component of FIT is that relatively newer renewable energy technologies receive better prices, encouraging investors to put money into developing innovative ways to generate power, he said.
“For example, since wind turbines technologies are mature, they are purchased at about 10 euro cents per watt per hour, whereas relatively newer technologies like photovoltaic [PV] power can be sold for as much as 60 euro cents per watt hour — but in the future with the advancement of PV technology, the prices will similarly go down,” he said.
Coal-generated power, on the other hand, can only be sold at about eight euro cents per unit, he said.
The final component of the scheme is that all power users share the additional cost of the electricity, induced by being generated from clean sources, which has several advantages, Shurig said.
“Currently about 11 percent of Germany’s electricity comes from clean sources. If you divide the extra cost by all power users across the nation, that only translates to about 1.5 euros per household extra per month,” he said.
The scheme works seamlessly as a “transitional policy” because when clean energy only comprises a small percentage of the total energy output of a nation, the additional cost shared by all power users is “barely noticeable,” Shurig said.
“And as an energy technology matures and is capable of producing more power output, its set price decreases, so that everyone’s power bills remain relatively the same,” he said.
Since the renewable developments do not come from tax dollars, not only are governments alleviated of the burden of providing subsidies, should a country elect a new government, the renewable power plants cannot be taken away, since they are bought and owned by the people, he said.
Joe Hsu (徐鼎昌), unit chief of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ task force on international environmental affairs, said FIT could work for Taiwan.
Hsu said, however, that government incentives were very important to encourage businesses to develop innovative clean energy technologies at home.
“We have the technology to manufacture very advanced solar panels, but we mostly export them — only 0.7 percent of Taiwan’s energy currently come from clean sources — this is largely because of our lack of an environmental policy scheme,” he said. “Taiwan needs two policy segments to increase that percentage: First we need an emissions cap — this can be achieved as soon as our greenhouse gas emission reduction act passes the new legislature.”
Although the Taipower Company currently purchases wind energy and solar energy from private generators at a favorable price — NT$2 and NT$17 per unit, respectively, compared to NT$1.0 for coal-burning electricity — Hsu said the lack of a greenhouse gas emission cap for businesses may still make it cheaper and more convenient for power generators to employ the traditional coal-burning method.
“The government should also set for power companies an obligated percentage of electricity to come from clean sources — this would need further planning,” he said.
In addition to developing clean energy sources, Taiwan could also reduce its greenhouse gas emission with energy conservation strategies, said Honda Chen (陳鴻達), chief secretary of the Bureau of Labor Insurance, who formerly served as a researcher at the Energy and Environment Research Laboratories at the Industrial Technology Research Institute.
“Present electricity prices in Taiwan are too low and could be raised as an economic tool to control the market,” Chen said.
“Since Taiwan’s electricity is subsidized by the government, allowing coal-burning generated electricity to be cheap even though Taipower is running at a loss, Taiwan’s massive emission per capita is lower only than the US,’” Chen said.
If Taiwan’s electricity prices increase, the FIT would work even better, said Jesper Grolin, executive director of the e-parliament and a former professor of environment and economics.
The improvement would come because “the narrowed gap between traditional and renewable energy prices would compete fairly in market,” he said.
The FIT is a state effort to reduce the cost of developing renewables and making them competitive in the energy market, and to set a stable investment climate for renewable technologies, Grolin said.
“The current market fails to reflect true prices of electricity produced by traditional coal-burning power plants when they receive governmental subsidies,” he said.
“Should Taiwan set a good price for PV, wind or solar thermal power, entrepreneurs that are abundant in the country will be motivated to mass produce them,” Grolin said.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang