Staff reporter
During the final presidential debate on Sunday the two candidates focused on personal attacks rather than explaining their policies, making it unlikely that either would have expanded their support base or attracted swing voters, analysts said.
National Sun Yat-sen University political science professor Liao Da-chi (廖達琪) said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) criticized Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) rival Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) over his moral character and "cross-strait common market" policy but failed to explain his own manifesto, including his "happiness economy" and "reconciliation and coexistence" policies.
Although Hsieh's fierce challenges created an opportunity for Ma to defend and promote his policies, Ma still failed to present a clear explanation of his policies, especially the complicated "cross-strait common market" concept, Liao said.
Hsieh lambasted Ma's economic policies and proposed putting the "cross-strait common market" to the public in a referendum during the debate and in his closing remarks, urged voters who support the common market to vote for Ma and voters that oppose it to vote for him.
Ma, while being mostly on the defensive, focused his attacks on the performance of the DPP administration over the past eight years, hoping to connect Hsieh with the failures, as he sees them, of President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) administration.
Shih Cheng-feng (
"Hsieh is smarter than President Chen. Rather than discussing the Taiwan sovereignty issue directly, he wrapped the issue in the common market concept. It's a brilliant strategy," Shih said.
However, neither candidate presented any new policies and turned the debate into a dull defensive battle in order to consolidate their support bases, Shih said.
Comparing the different formats of the debates, Shih described the questions asked during the first debate on Feb. 24 as "out of focus" and "shallow." Shih criticized the organizers for holding the second debate two weeks prior to the election, giving voters little chance to gain a deeper understanding of candidates' policies.
During the first debate, the two candidates were asked 20 videotaped questions from voters who were also given the opportunity to attend and question both candidates directly. Each candidate was given one minute to answer each question.
Sunday's debate returned to a more traditional format, inviting managers from five major media outlets to ask 10 questions, with the candidates given three minutes to answer each question.
Political analyst Wang Kung-yi (王崑義), a professor at National Taiwan Ocean University, said the questions, ranging from constitutional reform, economic policy to national defense, were more familiar issues for the candidates than the issues addressed in the first debate, such as environmental protection.
"It was good to see the candidates focus more on economic policy than on national identity and sovereignty," Wang said.
More focus on the economy rather than on national identity would lead the nation toward "normalization," he said.
Liao agreed that the questions on Sunday gave the candidates the opportunity to elaborate more on their policies, but added that the first debate had been an innovative attempt at "civil" politics.
"The questions raised by the public, although diverse, concerned our daily lives and should not be overlooked," she said.
Liao said she was concerned about the lack of female representation from the media and the lack of questions concerning women's and minority issues asked during the debate.
Wang Tai-li (王泰俐), a journalism professor at National Chengchi University, suggested the government should learn from the US and set up a commission to organize presidential debates.
In addition to encouraging representatives from minority groups to participate, Wang also called on the organizers to redesign the debate format and allow the candidates to ask follow-up questions.
The presidential debates were co-organized by the Central News Agency, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper), the China Times, the United Daily News, the Apple Daily and Public Television Service (PTS).
Shih suggested that the organizers hold more debates during the next election, each focusing on a separate issue, such as foreign policy and the economy.
SEND A MESSAGE: Sinking the amphibious assault ship, the lead warship of its class, is meant to show China the US Navy is capable of sinking their ships, an analyst said The US and allied navies plan to sink a 40,000-tonne ship at the latest Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise to simulate defeating a Chinese amphibious assault on Taiwan. This year’s RIMPAC — the 29th iteration of the world’s largest naval exercise — involves the US, 28 partners, more than 25,000 personnel, 40 warships, three submarines and more than 150 aircraft operating in and around Hawaii from yesterday to Aug. 1, the US Navy said in a press release. The major components of the event include multidomain warfare exercises in multiship surface engagements, anti-submarine warfare and multi-axis defense of a carrier strike
A new message broadcast on the Taipei MRT’s Wenhu (Brown) Line urging passengers to yield their seats to those in need, not necessarily elderly people, would be extended to other MRT lines and public transportation in the capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) said yesterday. Chiang was responding to reporters’ questions on the sidelines of a news conference at Taipei City Hall promoting healthy walking. Several disputes over priority seats on public transportation have recently been reported, sparking debate about who qualifies to sit in them, as most of the cases involved elderly people asking young people to give up their
Taiwanese could risk being extradited to China when traveling in countries with close ties to Beijing, Taiwan Association of University Professors deputy chairman Chen Li-fu (陳俐甫) said on Friday. Chen’s comments came after China on Friday last week announced new judicial guidelines targeting Taiwanese independence advocates. Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos and Djibouti are among the countries where Taiwanese could risk being extradited to China, he said. The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday elevated the travel alert for China, Hong Kong and Macau to “orange” after Beijing announced its guidelines to “severely punish Taiwanese independence diehards for splitting the country and inciting secession.” Extradition treaties
The airspace around Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) is to be closed for an hour on July 25 and July 23 respectively, due to the Han Kuang military exercises, the Ministry of National Defense said yesterday. The annual exercise is to be held on Taiwan proper and its outlying islands from July 22 to 26. During last year’s exercise, the military conducted anti-aircraft landing drills at the Taoyuan airport for the first time, for which a one-hour no-fly ban was issued. Based on a live-fire bulletin sent out by the Maritime and Port Bureau, the nation’s