It is perfectly appropriate that Taiwan ask for clarification on US policy with regard to Taiwan's participation in the international community, a former White House security affairs adviser said.
Stephen Yates, former deputy assistant for national security affairs to US Vice President Dick Cheney and now president of DC Asia Advisory, a Washington-based consultancy, told the Taipei Times last week during a visit to Taiwan that the government can ask for clarification on US policy on the following grounds.
On the one hand, US government officials say the long-standing policy of the US does not support Taiwan's membership in international organizations that require statehood, Yates said.
PHOTO: CNA
On the other, the Taiwan Relations Act explicitly states that normalization of relations with Beijing is not to be used as a pretext to exclude Taiwan from international organizations.
"So people can very reasonably ask for clarification for what exactly is US policy." he said. "And why it is in the US' interest to exclude Taiwan or not support Taiwan's membership."
SPACE
The other issue that Taiwan can reasonably ask for clarification on, Yates said, is for the US to give more specific information as to where there is remaining international organization space for Taiwan.
"Where are the organizations that do not require statehood? Where is the rest of the international space? And how does the United States propose working cooperatively with Taiwan to find its way into full participation in those areas?" he said.
While American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Stephen Young interpreted Chinese President Hu Jintao's (
OFFENSIVE
If Young's proposition is true, Yates said that such a notion would be offensive to President Chen Shui-bian (
"If the president of France wanted to open channels with the next US president, that might rub the current US president the wrong way," he said. "You're sort of counting their days, pretending they were no longer there."
If that was China's objective as Young's comments may have indicated, Yates said it was an unwise approach. And if China is interested in opening contacts with Taiwan, they will do it.
"But they can't do it," he said. "Taiwan doesn't have the doors closed. Taiwan is not putting any unreasonable preconditions in the way. If China is serious about having contacts and channels and communication, my impression is that multiple people in Taiwan are willing to receive them."
Yates said it might be true that there is greater opportunity for dialogue with a new leader in Taiwan, but that one would have to also ask why Beijing could not find opportunities for dialogue in the last eight years.
While Young has said that he believed the continued development of China's economy and civil society will lead eventually to political liberalization and democratization, Yates said there was hope of this but that no one has any evidence to say it will happen.
"We're making policy based on hope rather than evidence and experience and that might be risky," he said.
With US opposition to the referendum on joining the UN under the name "Taiwan," Chen said that such a move could trigger an emotional backlash and affect bilateral relations.
"I think the US has to be careful in recognizing a growing perception of how the US is using its influence in the political process of Taiwan," he said.
On Young's remark that Taiwan's "ceasing" of the functioning and application of the National Unification Council and Unification Guidelines damaged mutual trust in US-Taiwan relations, Yates dismissed this as "a value judgement" and "not terribly useful."
"President Chen -- regardless of what value judgment people attach to his presidency -- his presidency ends in May next year, so what good is there in trying to sort of brand his actions at this point?" he asked. "At this point, it should be focused on what can be accomplished in the remaining months of his presidency and then building an agenda that can carry forward into the next administration in Taiwan."
REFERENDUM
Yates said anyone can make a case why Taiwan would not be able to join the UN, but that in itself would not make the UN referendum unnecessary.
In the eyes of the US, it is not necessary for Taiwan to hold the referendum, but that's not why the referendum is on the ballot, he said.
It is taking place because a very large number of people think it is necessary, Yates said.
Because the signatures have already been gathered, it is a mistake to focus too much criticism on one person or one party, he said.
"This is a popular movement from the bottom up and so it's a bit more profound for us to think about than just the will of one leader," he said.
Yates said he did not think the referendum by itself can be isolated from the impact it is going to have on relations with the US and cross-strait relations.
It is part of a multi-part mix of factors, he said, and these would shape attitudes and relationships between Taipei and Beijing and between Taipei and Washington.
Yates encouraged Taiwan to communicate what it is trying to achieve to the US and the international community, but emphasized that communication does not just take place between governments.
FREE SOCIETY
Taiwan has the natural advantage of being a free society with a media that can get the message out, he said, adding that it is important for Taiwan to focus on connecting with the people of the US and the international community so that people have a broader understanding of the situation here.
If national leaders had more of their own constituents interested in the situation in Taiwan and in improving relations with Taiwan, then those leaders would be motivated to look at the cross-strait situation differently, he said.
Being in a diplomatic community, Yates said it is easier to be friendly with China while keeping Taiwan at arm's length.
"So if you are asking people to be closer to Taiwan and at more arm's length with China, there has to be a different motivation for that," he said. "The motivation usually has to be a domestic constituency that cares."
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by