President Chen Shui-bian's (
Tuesday was the last day Chen could make a formal rebuttal to the opposition-initiated recall motion. Instead of issuing a statement to the legislature, however, Chen decided to address the nation and respond to the opposition pan-blue camp's 10 accusations.
The accusations include corruption, abuse of power, obstruction of justice, suppression of the media, incompetent governance and violating the Constitution.
The legislature yesterday began the four-day review of the recall proposal and will vote on it on Tuesday.
The motion is considered unlikely to pass given the high threshold required -- it must win two-thirds support in the legislature before a nationwide referendum can be held.
Commenting on the president's address, Lee Yeau-tarn (李酉潭), an associate professor at National Chengchi University's Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, said Chen had shown sincerity in answering the accusations.
"It is impossible to make everybody in the pan-blue camp happy because their only agenda is to topple the government and win elections, especially the presidential election in 2008," he said.
On a scale from zero to 100, Lee said that he rated Chen's performance a 90.
As recalling the president is a poor option in a country with a presidential and semi-presidential system, Lee said that the pan-blue camp was abusing constitutional powers to achieve its goal of seizing power.
The pan-blue camp had hoped to set a constitutional precedent by having Chen offer an official rebuttal and by questioning officials at public hearings.
Chen Yen-hui (陳延輝), a professor at the Graduate Institute of Political Science at National Taiwan Normal University, expressed a similar view.
"I watched the president's televised public address from start to finish and found it very touching, especially when he said he was willing to sacrifice himself for democracy," he said. "Only a believer in peace and democracy would make such a remark."
Chen Yen-hui said the younger generation might not understand how politics operated and what life was like during the 50 years of KMT rule, but that a 60-year-old man like him, who had lived through the authoritarian era, knew exactly what the president was talking about in his speech.
"I'm afraid if we do not march forward down the road of democracy, we will be again governed by a dictatorial regime," he said.
On a scale from zero to 100, he rated President Chen's performance a 90.
However, Chen Yen-hui said there was still much room for improvement in terms of the administration's performance, although he recognized the dilemma the government faced at the legislature.
Ger Yeong-kuang (葛永光), a professor of political science at National Taiwan University, gave President Chen's address a low mark, saying that he had failed in three areas.
First, Ger said the president failed to reach the ultimate goal of effectively convincing the public and opposition parties that the 10 accusations made to justify the recall motion did not make sense.
In terms of the content of the speech, Ger said that the president failed to offer a clear account of the corruption scandals plaguing his family and in-laws.
"It gives the public the impression that the more he tries to explain the scandals, the more it is like he is trying to straighten out the contradictions of a lie with more lies," he said.
With regard to the strategy, Ger said that the president's use of Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) in a public address was an apparent attempt to court pan-green supporters, most of whom are Hoklo native speakers.
"While the president claimed in his speech that he is a victim of ethnic persecution, his choice of the Hoklo dialect [sic] in fact deepens ethnic divisions," he said.
On a scale from zero to 100, Ger gave Chen a grade of 50.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by