Many people feel that critics of President Chen Shu-bian's (陳水扁) proposal to abolish the National Unification Council (NUC) and unification guidelines have overreacted, including the US government.
Senior Adviser to the President Peng Ming-min (彭明敏) said: "It is undeniable that the president's proposal to scrap the National Unification Council and guidelines is in some degree based on domestic political considerations, but I think the US government has completely overreacted."
"It baffles me as to why the US opposes the idea of getting rid of a dead document and something that was long forgotten and not functional," he added. Besides, Peng continued, the president did not break his "four no's and one without" promises because the precondition for the pledges no longer exists.
Although the administration must value the US government's opinion, he said that it is impossible for Taiwan to listen to the US all of the time.
Peng also blamed the pro-unification media for complicating the matter by blowing the issue out of proportion, which caused the US to overreact.
Discussing US concerns, another Senior Adviser to the President Huang Chu-wen (黃主文) said that one democratic country must respect the democratic development of another democratic country.
Although the National Unification Council and guidelines had their historical purpose, Huang said that they are like the sign of a shop that is no longer in business and should be abandoned as soon as possible.
"When I asked former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) why he wanted to set up the unification council in the first place, he told me at that time that it was simply a safety helmet and that it did not have much meaning," Huang said.
As the first native-born Taiwanese president, Lee established the council in 1990 in order to secure his political position at the top of an authoritarian regime dominated by mainlanders, who still harbored the illusion of "reclaiming China." The guidelines were adopted by the council in 1991 as the blueprint for the government's cross-strait policy.
democratic and free
The guidelines set a goal to pursue unification with a China that is governed by a democratic and free system with an equitable distribution of wealth.
The guidelines also outline what positive steps both sides can take in the near, medium and long-term to ultimately achieve the goal of unification.
As Lee increased his hold on political power, he refrained from calling any more meetings of the council.
Chen raised political eyebrows when he proposed on the first day of the Lunar New Year that the time was ripe to seriously consider abolishing the council and guidelines.
The suggestion was widely seen as a move to counter Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) theory of "eventual unification."
Chen's proposal touched off a heated debate and drew immense criticism, both at home and abroad.
Despite media reports, the US State Department has yet to fully concede that secret trips were conducted by two US officials -- National Security Council Asia specialist Dennis Wilder and the State Department's chief Taiwan staffer, Clifford Hart -- to Taipei for meetings with Chen to try and convince him to drop plans to eliminate the unification council and guidelines.
But such trips have taken place in the past at times of particular strain in US-Taiwan relations. When Chen proposed to hold a referendum in tandem with the 2004 presidential election, the US government sent Michael Green, then senior director for East Asian affairs of the US National Security Council, to Taipei in November 2003.
On both occasions, Chen has admitted that he was under tremendous pressure, especially from the US government.
Domestically, Chen came under fire from both opposition parties and some of his own party members.
Former DPP chairman Shih Ming-teh (施明德) described the unification council and guidelines as "mummies consigned to the trash can" and criticized Chen's proposal as "half-witted" and "lacking political wisdom," saying that such a move was like "fetching the mummies out of the trash can."
Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) also questioned the process, saying that the abolition of the NUC could be done via a simple order issued by a bureau chief at the Presidential Office.
He also called on the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to take a more moderate stance in order to prevent voters at the center of the political spectrum from drifting toward the KMT.
DPP Legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) criticized Chen for being selfish, saying all he cares about during his final two years in office is how to best consolidate his position within the party rather than how to safeguard the interests of the party and the country.
Peng, however, dismissed Lin's remarks as too "cynical" because they assume that Chen's objectives are entirely self-serving.
moved
Branding Chen as an "idealist," Peng said that he personally was moved by a remark Chen made before the 2004 presidential election.
Chen was under enormous pressure from the US in the run-up to the poll. On the night of Dec. 23, 2003, Peng said that he was at Chen's house talking with the president for two hours.
"He told me that he did not care if he lost the election, but he had to set a precedent for the people to have the right to vote on important national issues," he said.
Wu Li-pei (吳澧培), another senior presidential advisor, said the president's proposal to scrap the unification council and guidelines was aimed at "opening a new road for Taiwan" because it removes the shackles from the people and returns sovereignty to them.
As Chen is under intense pressure, Wu called on the public to show their support for him. Wu said he hoped Chen would continue down the same path and not flinch because the matter would have a significant impact on the country's future.
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS