Local media unleashed what at first appeared to be bombshell of a report yesterday, revealing KMT plans to launch a no-confidence vote against Premier Chang Chun-hsiung's (
But once the smoke cleared, the KMT categorically denied the idea was part of the party's strategy and it became apparent that the document was actually leaked to the press by a member of the DPP.
KMT spokesman Wang Chih-kang (
"This is a suggestion put forth by individual academics. The decision to raise a no-confidence vote will depend on the overall political situation and on public opinion," Wang said.
Wang, however, questioned the DPP's motives in publicizing the information.
The information was published by local newspapers yesterday, following the divulgence of a KMT research paper focusing on such a strategy for the upcoming legislative election.
DPP Central Standing Committee member Lawrence Gao (高志鵬), who received the paper from friends working in the KMT, passed the information to the media.
The research paper, written in early March, recommends that the KMT seek support for the no-confidence vote by conducting a series of opinion polls on the policies of the DPP government to highlight its low support rating -- a theme that would be timely for President Chen Shui-bian's (
The paper says that June would be an ideal time for a no-confidence vote, which would force a dissolution and reelection of the legislature by the end of August.
This would mean holding the legislative election three months in advance of the originally-planned election in early December.
The paper says the KMT would benefit from an early vote because this would effectively separate the legislative election from local government elections.
The DPP and People First Party (PFP) would then be unable to use the popularity of their candidates running for local government positions to help boost legislative campaigns.
In addition, it argues that early elections would simplify inter-party cooperation in the year-end elections by limiting the cooperation to the local government elections, and prevent KMT supporters from confusing their party affiliation.
The KMT is currently planning to cooperate with the PFP in local government elections, but at the same time may risk losing votes to the PFP in the legislative election because of the overlapping support base of the two parties.
The paper was presented for discussion in a meeting of the DPP's Central Standing Committee yesterday. After the meeting, the DPP issued a statement urging the KMT to abandon partisan and personal interests and give way to national interests.
"Since its defeat in the March presidential election last year, the KMT has resorted to different tactics in an attempt to paralyze the executive branch. It is not surprising that a research group within the KMT has come up with a strategy to overthrow the Cabinet," the statement said.
In response, KMT spokeswoman Chen Feng-hsin (
James Chen (
However, hardly anyone is talking about raising the vote now, Chen said, adding that there would be no reason for the KMT to raise the no-confidence vote unless the DPP government makes another huge policy mistake.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or