In the wake of Chinese hijacker Gao Jun (
However, Lai Hsieh-yi (
PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES
"They [the MOJ and the prison] won't let him go back because he's such a troublemaker," he said.
Gao Jun was one of 16 Chinese who hijacked 12 Chinese domestic flights to Taiwan seeking political asylum in a so-called "hijacking fever" that occurred between April 1993 and June 1994. Armed only with a scalpel, Gao single-handedly hijacked a Chinese Northern Airlines MD-82 jet on a Qingdao to Fuzhou flight on Dec. 8, 1993.
After serving over two-thirds of his 10-year sentence, Gao was paroled on Feb. 19 and was sent to the Hsinchu refugee camp, where he was put on probation to await repatriation to China.
As soon as Gao arrived at the refugee camp he started a hunger strike -- the purpose of which was not clear, Lai said.
"He wants to draw attention and distinguish himself by not cooperating. He used to refuse repatriation; now he says he wants to go back [to China] soon. But I wonder if, when we're to send him back, he might resist again," Lai said.
Citing the concern that Gao's mood might be disturbed, Lai declined a request by the Taipei Times to interview the hijacker, but allowed reporters to see him outside the railings of his cell. Inmates typically live together in large bunk dormitories and are only placed in single-person cells as a security measure or for punishment when they break certain regulations.
Gao looked sane and well. Knowing there was a photographer outside, he sat or stood with his back constantly to the door. When Lai reproached him for not eating, he replied, "I said I don't eat; I just don't."
Gao's hunger strike has now moved into its 15th day, and the refugee camp today plans to have him force-fed by doctors for a third time.
Lai said Gao continues to resist every instruction and knocks over his food tray at meals.
Gao is the last of the 16 hijackers to receive parole and to be transferred to the Hsinchu refugee camp. However, he is by no means the only hijacker to have given camp officials a hard time.
As Gao's probation officer, Lai said it is his duty to report Gao's breach of the conduct rules to the MOJ via the Bureau of Immigration and suggest that Gao's parole be revoked. But Lai said he had tried such a move with another hijacker and failed.
In July 1999, hijacker Qi Dachuan
It has been widely reported by the media that the hijackers have caused significant trouble while in prison. For example, Gao is reported to have swallowed toothbrushes and a thermometer. Hunger strikes, riots and fights in the prison were also frequently reported.
"It is understandable that the prison wants them to stay here until repatriation," Lai said.
The most notable and shocking act of the hijackers took place on Feb. 8, 1999, when three of them repeated the crime. On their pre-repatriation flight from Hsinchu to Kinmen with six other hijackers, Yang Mingde (楊明德), Lin Wenqiang (林文強) and Wang Zhihua (王志華) injured Jan Jyh-horng (詹志宏), deputy secretary general of the Straits Exchange Foundation, with a sharp iron weapon and demanded that the plane be flown to Guam.
The attempt failed and the trio were brought back to Taiwan and convicted of hijacking a second time. They are now in the process of appeals.
Several officials were disciplined over the incident, including the refugee camp director, who was replaced because he was deemed to have been negligent in failing to prevent the trio from making the weapon and taking it on board the plane.
The state watchdog Control Yuan also formally condemned the National Police Administration and demanded the refugee camp enhance the management of hijackers being held on probation.
The reasons for hijackers' inclination to be emotionally frustrated are multifold, successive directors of the refugee camp have said.
First, unlike other inmates, most of whom are illegal immigrants, the hijackers will still face further trials and harsh punishments after they go back to China.
It was reported that the first repatriated Chinese hijacker, Huang Shugang (
Former camp directors also said that by escaping China the hijackers expected to receive a hero's treatment in Taiwan, as was the case for their counterparts during the Cold War era. However, the change of history put them instead behind bars, and they found the reality hard to accept.
Besides, Lai said, some hijackers see themselves as superior to ordinary illegal immigrants. "They regard themselves as coming to Taiwan with a brave act and a political belief and they believe they are different from others who came here on boats just to get a job," Lai said.
"Therefore, some of them don't get along very well with other inmates."
As Lai gave the Taipei Times reporters a tour of a secure zone dormitory, an inmate shouted: "Sir! Someone hit me!"
The man who shouted was Han Shuxue (
Han was sentenced to 11 years and was paroled and sent to the refugee camp in February 1999. Li has already been sent back to China. Lai said Han has been noisy for more than a month this time.
"He has been very fussy and likes to make complaints against camp staff and other inmates," Lai said, "However, his situation is not very serious and what we do is admonish him."
There are now six hijackers waiting to be repatriated in the camp, excluding Yuan Bin (
Lai said the couple behaves very well in the camp and that they are allowed to visit each other weekly.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or