Sun, Dec 03, 2000 page2

• Of penguins, pandas and politics

  Environmentalists and animal activists say the Taipei City Zoo isn't fulfilling its obligation to promote animal conservation. Rather, it wants to bring in ever more exotic animals to promote tourism in the city

  • By Ko Shu-ling / STAFF REPORTER
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  After a 65-day wait, the dreams of an entire nation were shattered Friday when the Taipei City Zoo announced the death of what would have been Taiwan's first penguin to be hatched in captivity.

  As the entire nation mourned the death of the marine bird embryo, animal rights groups expressed their concern over the introduction of exotic animals to the zoo, questioning the reason why such establishments exist at all.

  

  In contrast to king penguins, koalas usually sleep during daylight hours.

  PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES

  Following the koala craze last year, the zoo imported four king penguins in September, with plans to add 10 more king penguins and 30 black-footed penguins to the group.

  

  The king penguins have attracted huge crowds to the zoo.

  PHOTO: CHIANG YING-YING, TAIPEI TIMES

  Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has instructed the zoo to study the possibility of introducing giant pandas in the near future, pending approval from the central government.

  In subtropical Taiwan, the arrival of the four Antarctic creatures has sparked a frenzy among the media and the public. As the media provided a daily update of the egg's progress, zoo-goers, mostly children, queued up in kilometer-long lines for up to two hours each weekend just for a 20-second glimpse of it.

  As of Nov. 27, the zoo had seen 5 million visitors this year. The last time the zoo had a turnout approaching this figure was last year when the two koalas imported from Australia were introduced to the public.

  When the zoo relocated from Yuanshan, Shihlin District to its current premises in Mucha, Wenshan District in 1986, it attracted about 5.3 million people.

  Attempting to explain the amazing popularity the penguins have aquired among Taiwan's public, some observers say that the birds, which hail from freezing climes, are seen as "exotic" animals in subtropical Taiwan.

  Others say the zoo's record attendence figures can be explained as a backlash against Taiwan's politics.

  The drama revolving around the four penguins has certainly captured the public's imagination. Originally, the zoo intended to import two male and two female penguins from Japan. For some reason, however, it received three females and one male.

  Once the male penguin had picked his mate, she laid an egg five days after the penguin house was opened to the public on Sept. 23.

  Except for the first few days after the egg was laid -- during which time the female sat on it -- the male incubated the egg continuously.

  When it first became clear that there was little sign of the egg hatching, zoo keepers initially planned to replace it with a fake and have the real one examined to find out whether it was fertile or not.

  They ultimately delayed action until the 65th day, however, when zoo authorities confirmed that the egg was fertile but the embryo had died during the later stage of the incubation. The normal incubation period for a penguin egg is 65 to 68 days.

  Money is no object

  Taipei City Zoo also plans to introduce giant pandas. The proposal has received the endorsement of the mayor, and the zoo authorities claim that they have the ability to breed, raise and manage the bears.

  Zoo Director Yang Sheng-hsiung (楊勝雄) denied that the zoo has financial motives for introducing exotic animals.

  "Selling more tickets is definitely a good thing but not our main goal. Our concern is more to educate the public about animal conservation," he said.

  Just how effective, though, is the education when thousands of people are forced to line up for hours and crowd into a single room just for a 20-second glimpse of the animal?

  "The huge crowds of people are bound to dwindle as the fuss dies down. We encourage visitors to take advantage of the tour guide services and useful literature and posters," Yang said.

  The idea of introducing giant pandas to Taipei's zoo is not new. It dates back to the 1980's when the Zoological Society of Taipei (台北市動物之友協會) was formed to provide the zoo with financial support and non-governmental contact with non-diplomatic allies.

  The idea was first initiated by the incumbent chairman of the society, Hung Wen-tung (洪文棟), a former legislator, after Hung's visit to a panda house in a Japan zoo, according to Li Te-hsien (李德嫻), secretary-general of the society.

  "Back then, the tourism industry had not been liberalized and the Taipei City Zoo had few rare animals to attract visitors. Hung thought that it might not be a bad idea to bring the animals from elsewhere in the world to Taiwan, particularly giant pandas," Li said.

  After years of visits and negotiations, Li said, China issued the requisite country-to-country animal export license twice but both were turned down by the Council of Agriculture.

  "They didn't give us any specific reason, but it's not hard to figure out," she said, adding that political issues played a significant role.

  Just as talk of importing giant pandas seemed to be quieting down, it has recently been brought up again. According to Li, China is still interested in exporting a pair of pandas to Taiwan.

  "If it still doesn't work this time, we'll try to import other unique animals such as the golden snub-nosed monkey, Japanese crane and Siberian tiger," Li said.

  The organization two years ago signed a treaty with the Zoological Society of China (中國動物園協會), confirming the two organizations as the sole two organizations responsible for coordinating the import and export of rare animals in Taiwan and China, Lin said.

  Noah's ark

  Despite the educational and social role claimed by the zoo authorities, animal rights groups have expressed strong opposition to the introduction of rare animals from overseas and, indeed, to the very existence of zoos.

  "A zoo is not a Noah's ark, it doesn't need to have a comprehensive collection of the world's animals," said Chen Yu-min (陳玉敏), director of the Environment & Animal Society of Taiwan (動物社會研究會).

  Master Wu Hung (悟弘法師), the organization's chairman, agreed.

  "A zoo is supposed to play a role in animal education, conservation, and restoration. The zoo not only has done none of these, but also has made itself more and more commercialized and entertainment-oriented," he said, adding that he is in favor of the idea of shutting down all Taiwan's zoos and aquariums.

  Taiwan currently has four public zoos and two public aquariums. The four public zoos are located in Taipei, Kaohsiung, Hsinchu, and Nantou. The two public aquariums are located in Pintung and the offshore island of Penghu.

  More efforts, Wu Hung said, should be put into the conservation and breeding of animals that are unique to Taiwan.

  "Remember Taipei City Zoo is under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Education, not some tourism or business department," he said. "Animals should not be treated as commodities nor used as a tool for any political purposes. Peace across the Taiwan Strait can only be reached through mutual understanding and respect."

  The Environment & Animal Society of Taiwan is the organization which recently launched a campaign against China's bear farming and bear bile trade.

  The campaign is part of a worldwide crusade initiated by the UK-based World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA).

  Bear farming was adopted in China in 1984. The bile is extracted from the animals through a tube inserted into their gallbladders.

  Though the method does not involve killing the bear, international conservationists and animal rights groups are strongly against it because they believe it is cruel.

  Years ago the organization staged campaigns against Taipei City Zoo's failed attempt to import a polar bear from Canada following the death of two polar bears that were to be brought in from a zoo in Switzerland.

  Chen is also concerned about the high level of animal fatalities at the zoo and the high construction costs of animal houses.

  "It's a costly business to run a zoo, and it's just not right nor natural to have animals live in an environment which costs a lot of money to build to simulate their original natural habitat," she said.

  According to zoo authorities, the penguin house is one of the most costly of the zoo's facilities. It cost about NT$30 million to build, while the koala house cost about NT$7 million. A panda house might cost about NT$90 million to build.

  The zoo has also budgeted NT$200 million to build a new butterfly and insect house on the spot where the current butterfly house now stands.

  The cost of feeding the zoo's 26,000 or so animals of over 300 different species is also huge. The two koalas alone account for NT$500,000 and the four penguins about NT$80,000 of total annual feeding costs of up to NT$30 million.

  Shen Li-yu (沈麗玉), founder of the Hualien-based Taiwan Animals' Rights & Welfare Society (花蓮動物權益促進會), agreed.

  "Polar bears do not belong in sub-tropical Taiwan, nor do penguins or pandas," she said. "No man-made living environment can be as good as their own natural habitat. Whatever facility is claimed to be as good as the animals' original habitat is judged according to the standards of humans, not the animals."

  Shen's views were echoed by Sakya Chun-fa (傳法師父), secretary-general of the Life Conservationist Association (關懷生命協會).

  "The best way to understand animals is to see them in the wild. They don't deserve to be captured, transported over long distances and eventually sold to a zoo," she said.

  But are animals really better off in the wild than in the zoo?

  "Well, if we keep interfering with their territory, we'll eventually have to pay the price," she said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Beauty queen to leave S Africa on nationality row

  • 2

    Taiwan win Premier12 title

  • 3

    Add Taiwan to ‘NATO Plus’: report

  • 4

    Taiwan advance to Premier12 gold match

  • 5

    Minister may step down after employee’s death