Minister of Education Ovid Tzeng (曾志朗) yesterday announced he would suggest to the Executive Yuan that the Hanyu Pinyin system (漢語拼音) be adopted as the standardized system of Romanizing Mandarin.
However, Tzeng's decision was criticized by Chiang Wen-yu (
Tzeng did not respect the opinion of the professionals -- given that he did not consult any of the council's members before announcing his decision yesterday, they said.
PHOTO: LIN CHENG-KUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
They said they would resign from their posts if Tzeng insisted on his decision.
Tzeng's decision has put a halt to the prolonged debate over which Romanization system Taiwan is to use, as tension between supporters of Hanyu and Tongyong shows no signs of easing.
Contention has centered on supporters of the Hanyu system who claim it is an internationally accepted system, while promoters of Tongyong, a system created by a group of Taiwanese linguists, say that it is a more suitable system for Taiwan's children to learn their mother tongues.
The two systems are 85 percent similar.
During a press conference held yesterday at the Ministry of Education, Tzeng said his decision was made in accordance with the conclusion reached on July 26 last year by the Executive Yuan's Educational Reform Committee, which recommended Hanyu be used as the official way of Romanizing Mandarin in Taiwan on the grounds that it is the best method to fulfil the needs of an increasingly globalized and computerized economy.
Tzeng said that the stance of the Executive Yuan hadn't changed since that time.
The education minister continued to explain the reasons for his selecting Hanyu over Tongyong.
"I appreciate the Mandarin Promotion Council's hard work on this matter, given its determination to preserve our native languages," Tzeng said. "However, their decision is in defiance of the agreement made by the Executive Yuan last year. Besides, there has been no tangible evidence to prove Tongyong is a favorable system in the learning of native languages ? Tongyong is not fully developed at the moment, so its practicability remains unknown."
On the other hand, Hanyu, acknowledged by the UN in 1986, is a tool developed as a result of years of research.
It has proven to be a stable system and is the most prevalent Mandarin Romanization system in use today, Tzeng said, adding that to choose a system corresponding to international usage should be of critical concern because it is Taiwan's national goal to re-enter the UN.
Tzeng conceded that no system was perfect, however, he said he did not see any complete compatibility between the two systems in the short term. Therefore he would suggest using Hanyu as a foundation, but making slight adjustments based on the spirit of Tongyong.
He said problematic morphemes in the Hanyu system such as "X," "Q" and "Z" should be improved after more research.
When asked by the media about the system to be adopted by elementary school students to learn native languages when the program begins next year, Tzeng said that he would be recommending the adoption of the traditional Mandarin Phonetic Symbols (注音符號) used in Taiwan (also known as "bopomofo") which would be supplemented by notation that would be needed in specific cases.
He also decided that Academia Sinica would be charged with looking into this question in a year's time.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS