Several Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members have called on the party to review its cross-strait policy and recruit more young people following its trouncing in Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections.
It was the second consecutive presidential election that the KMT has lost to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) since 2016, and fourth since the first direct presidential election in 1996.
The KMT also failed to secure a legislative majority in Saturday’s polls.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
The election results show that “the KMT could end up being replaced by other parties if it does not undertake reforms,” KMT Organizational Development Committee Youth Department Director Hsiao Ching-yan (蕭敬嚴) wrote on Facebook.
Attributing the party’s losses to its outdated cross-strait policy and leadership, Hsaio urged it to propose “a new cross-strait discourse that meets the expectation of a majority of Taiwanese.”
The “1992 consensus” is no longer relevant and has been rejected by the public in the elections, he said.
The party must appoint young people to important positions and adopt more ideas from the younger generation, he added.
KMT Taipei City Councilor Yu Shu-hui (游淑慧) also urged the party to rethink its cross-strait stance.
Cross-strait policy was a key issue in the presidential election and as Taiwanese have made their choice, “the KMT should respect the DPP’s way of handling cross-strait relations,” she wrote on Facebook.
The KMT should also reconsider the “1992 consensus,” proposed 28 years ago, she said, adding: “If you are wearing a piece of clothing that is out of date and does not fit you, then it is time for you to review it or look for a replacement.”
While many older KMT members seem to agree that the party needs to recruit more young people, they appeared reserved about other proposals.
One of the reasons behind the electoral defeats was the party’s poorly planned presidential primary, which upset some candidates and affected party solidarity, former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) said.
As KMT chairman, Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) must shoulder the responsibility, she said, adding: “We really have to pass the baton to the younger generation.”
The party must continue to build its brand, explain its core beliefs and foster more young talent, she said.
However, due to its historical significance, “the name of the Chinese Nationalist Party must never change,” she added.
More than 20 KMT members — including Yu, Taipei city councilors Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Wang Hung-wei (王鴻薇), KMT Legislator Jason Hsu (許毓仁) and Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) election campaign spokespeople Huang Man-hsin (黃曼昕) and Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) — yesterday formed an alliance called “+1” to push for across-the-board reforms within the party.
The alliance demanded that Wu immediately resign his post as chairman, instead of waiting for the KMT Central Standing Committee’s approval on Wednesday, and that he and retired lieutenant general Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) withdraw their names from the party’s list of legislator-at-large nominees.
Wu Sz-huai’s nomination has played a part in the KMT’s defeat in the legislative elections, KMT Taipei City Councilor Chang Shi-gang (張斯綱) said.
The so-called “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and Beijing that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) in 2006 admitted that he had made up the term in 2000.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS