Members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday accused former premier Simon Chang (張善政) of discriminating against women, while the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) vice presidential candidate said that his words had been misconstrued.
At a campaign event on Thursday, Chang said that while being unmarried is not wrong, “President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has not given birth, so she would not understand the feelings of a parent,” as he spoke about health policy for immigrant women during pregnancy.
At a briefing at Tsai’s Taipei campaign office, DPP Taipei City Councilor Chien Hsu-pei (簡舒培) said that Chang had previously appeared cultured, “but now he speaks with odious words filled with discrimination.”
Photo: Wang Jung-hsiang, Taipei Times
“It makes people wonder whether he has caught the [Kaohsiung Mayor] ‘Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) virus,’ which has changed him into another person,” Chien said.
Han is the KMT’s presidential candidate.
Tsai said that her work justified her.
“I am a woman who is not married and does not have children, which some have made into a big issue,” Tsai wrote on Facebook.
“However, I have joined many women immersed in public affairs who have worked extra hard to achieve greater things and we have proved ourselves,” she wrote.
“Times are changing and Taiwan is making progress,” she wrote. “A woman in a skirt can become the supreme commander of the armed forces. Whether we have children does not diminish the resolve in our hearts and minds to build a better future for the next generation.”
“I am working to expand childcare services and to set up a better social welfare net,” Tsai wrote.
“Looking back to when Chang was premier, what did he do for our children?” she asked.
DPP Legislator Lin Ching-yu (林靜儀), an obstetrician and gynecologist, said that people must not use sex and physiology as criteria when choosing a president.
“To have good leadership and competency to govern a nation, as well as empathy for common people, a person needs a brain,” Lin said.
“We ask the KMT candidates to use their brains and not just think about reproductive organs,” she said.
Chang told reporters that “if people did not understand what he was saying, he could withdraw and rephrase them.”
“President Tsai, please have sympathy for parents who are pregnant and for immigrant women who are pregnant, but have no health insurance,” he said.
“Please support our policy and give them health insurance,” he said.
Chang asked reporters whether they grasped his point, adding: “There is no discrimination.”
It was online commenters trying to spin his words as if they were discriminatory against women, he said.
“I urge everyone to check what netizens were saying,” Chang said. “It was online bullying — an Internet army seeking to influence public opinion.”
“The online comments were pervasive in their criticisms and took my words out of context,” he said.
“Han has been vilified in this way for a long time and now I start campaigning and netizens are attempting to smear me, but they found that it was not so easy, so they twisted my words to make them malignant,” Chang said.
“It pains my heart to see this,” he added. “I have not seen clean campaigning, because the DPP has no achievements to tout, so it is resorting to negative tactics.”
Additional reporting by Shih Hsiao-guang
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say