Democracy advocates, among them Hong Kong singer-activist Denise Ho (何韻詩) and exiled Chinese dissident Yang Jianli (楊建利), yesterday attended the Oslo Freedom Forum in Taipei to encourage more people to support movements against authoritarian regimes.
Several speakers made references to the protests in Hong Kong, which have grown from a movement against a proposed extradition bill into calls for wider democratic reforms.
Taking the stage to cheers and applause, Ho said Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) caused the protests by misjudging the political situation.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
“By hiding behind the police force, refusing to resolve these political issues with political solutions, [Lam] has pushed our city into becoming a total police state,” Ho said.
She also dismissed Lam’s formal withdrawal of the extradition bill on Wednesday last week as “too little, too late,” saying that the protesters would continue to push for their demands.
Ho was later joined on stage by independent Legislator Freddy Lim (林昶佐), who thanked Hong Kong’s protesters for standing firm against China.
“Seeing our friends in Hong Kong continuing to have courage under such difficult circumstances, constantly moving forward and constantly renewing their protest actions, as people living in Taiwan, what right do we have to let go of everything that we have?” he asked.
Fears about Chinese capital coming in via Hong Kong had led to some discussion that Taiwan should protect itself from covert foreign interference by recognizing investments from Hong Kong as coming from an “ordinary city in China,” Lim said.
However, as doing so would effectively be “giving up” on Hong Kong, Taiwanese should stand with the territory and participate in a Sept. 29 march outside the Legislative Yuan organized by civic organizations, Lim said.
The forum struck an upbeat and hopeful note, despite its focus on authoritarian regimes.
Asked whether Hong Kong would see violent suppression akin to the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre in Beijing, Yang said that the possibility could not be ruled out, but added that violence remains a “very small” part of the protests.
Yang also said that he was “amazed” that Hong Kong’s protesters had kept up their momentum while avoiding any splintering, which most protest movements suffer.
Earlier in the day, Democratic Progressive Party Legislator You Mei-nu (尤美女), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Jason Hsu (許毓仁) and Marriage Equality Coalition Taiwan chief coordinator Jennifer Lu (呂欣潔) took to the stage to speak about Taiwan’s path to marriage equality.
Hsu said Taiwan’s legalization of same-sex marriage in May was “further proof that Taiwan’s soft power could lead Asia toward more progressive values.”
Lu said that Taiwan experienced all three possible routes to marriage equality — a constitutional interpretation, a referendum and legislation — in just three years.
This was a “severe challenge, but “marriage equality is the starting line, not the finishing line,” Lu said, adding that LGBT people in Taiwan continue to face discrimination.
Hsu said that despite the legal victory, equality was not yet assured on issues such as transnational marriage, adoption and surrogacy.
Other speakers related their struggles in Myanmar, North Korea, Thailand, Turkey and Venezuela.
Taiwan remains the only Asian nation to have hosted the forum, which is organized by the US-based Human Rights Foundation.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say