Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers yesterday lambasted a court ruling last week that allowed a judge convicted of sexual harassment to just pay a fine instead of losing his job, a ruling that was also criticized by two Control Yuan members.
The Judicial Yuan’s Court of the Judiciary in 2016 ruled that former Taipei High Administrative Court judge Chen Hung-pin (陳鴻斌) had sexually harassed his assistant and that he should be dismissed.
It was the first time a court had ordered a Taiwanese judge to be dismissed for sexual harassment, while the Control Yuan also impeached Chen for misconduct.
Photo: CNA
Chen appealed the ruling, and on Thursday the court overturned its previous ruling and decided to fine Chen an amount equal to his annual salary, or about NT$2.16 million (US$73,770). The verdict said that Chen was repentant and that only three of the eight alleged incidents of misconduct, which included kissing and hugging the assistant, constituted harassment.
However, the verdict was not a unanimous decision. Taiwan High Court Judge Hsieh Ching-hui (謝靜慧), one of the five judges presiding over the appeal, tendered her resignation after failing to convince her colleagues to uphold the original ruling.
DPP lawmakers hosting a news conference yesterday condemned the new ruling and said that they would seek to amend the Judges Act (法官法) to introduce external members to the Court of the Judiciary in a bid to improve its transparency and diversity.
Photo: CNA
DPP Legislator Chou Chun-mi (周春米) said the second trial was flawed by several procedural and other issues, such as the Court of the Judiciary not being chaired by the Public Functionary Disciplinary Sanction Committee chief commissioner, as required by law.
The ruling also failed to take into account structural factors contributing to sexual harassment, such as Chen abusing his power to harass the victim, Chou said.
“The Court of the Judiciary revoked its previous ruling and handed down a lenient monetary punishment, suggesting an ethical double standard in the judiciary as well as improperly covering up for a fellow judge,” DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) said.
DPP Legislator Liu Shih-fang (劉世芳) said it was regrettable that male chauvinism was still prevalent in society, and that even judges are tolerant of sexual harassment in the workplace.
Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lu Tai-lang (呂太郎) told lawmakers during a question-and-answer session of the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee yesterday that the second ruling did not meet public expectation or the ethical standards of the judiciary.
However, the ruling is final, unless the Control Yuan decides to appeal it, Lu said.
The Control Yuan later said that it would file an appeal.
Control Yuan members Wang Mei-yu (王美玉) and Fang Wan-fu (方萬富), who handled the Control Yuan investigation into Chen and launched the impeachment procedure, said the second ruling was unreasonably different from the first.
They also cited the failure of the committee commissioner to chair the trial, saying that it suggested flaws in the legal process.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or