The Cabinet’s draft amendment to the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) yesterday proceeded to committee reviews, despite protests by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative caucus.
Scuffles broke out in the legislative chamber in Taipei early yesterday when Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators began dragging their KMT colleagues away from the speaker’s podium, which they had occupied ahead of a first session to review the amendments.
KMT legislators Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) and Lin Wei-chou (林為洲) spearheaded the boycott, leading several other KMT legislators in shouting the slogan: “No report, no committee reviews.”
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
They were referring to assessments of the needs of different industries, which they said the Ministry of Labor should have conducted before the Executive Yuan approved the proposed amendment to the act.
The DPP’s heavy-handed approach to the draft amendment showed that it had not learned its lesson after it pushed through initial amendments to the act 11 months ago, Lin said.
He asked whether the DPP intends to change the act again if the new rules spark a backlash among workers or if they prove to be counterproductive to some industries.
The so-called “four flexible measures” in the amendment were designed to benefit employers, Lin said, adding that he could not believe the ministry had the audacity to say that there would be no changes to workers’ rights if the amendment is passed.
“How could workers’ rights remain unchanged when the rule mandating one day off after six days is to be changed to two days off after 12 days and the monthly overtime quota is to be raised from 46 to 54 hours?” Lin asked.
“None of the five draft regulations proposed by the Cabinet will benefit workers,” Chiang said, accusing Premier William Lai (賴清德), who approved the draft amendment, of “lacking empathy.”
The KMT legislators were vastly outnumbered after DPP legislators, who hold the legislative majority, entered the chamber.
DPP Legislator Su Chen-ching (蘇震清) and several others removed Lin from the podium, while DPP Legislator Chung Chia-pin (鍾佳濱) became entangled with Chiang and managed to edge him off the podium.
Chiang made several attempts to climb back onto the podium, which were foiled by DPP legislators, who were at that point in control of the situation, prompting Chiang to shout: “You are all members of the Capitalist Progressive Party.”
Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) appeared unfazed while presiding over the session, during which all motions tendered by the KMT to return the draft amendment to the Procedure Committee for further deliberation were voted down.
The draft amendment advanced to committee reviews in its entirety.
In other developments, the legislature approved the Executive Yuan’s nomination of National Central University law professor Chen In-chin (陳英鈐) as the new Central Election Commission (CEC) chairman.
Makeshift polling stations were set up in the legislative chamber in the afternoon for legislators to exercise their right of investiture.
Among the 72 legislators who cast ballots, 70 were in favor of the appointment, while two cast spoiled votes.
Nominee CEC deputy chairman Chen Chao-chien (陳朝建), and nominee CEC members Chou Chih-hung (周志宏), Tsai Chia-hung (蔡佳泓), Hsu Hui-feng (許惠峰) and Lin Chiung-chu (林瓊珠) were also approved.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say