The China Youth Corps yesterday denied an alleged connection with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), saying at a hearing that the allegation was based on prejudice by the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee.
The hearing was the second by the committee aimed at establishing whether the organization was controlled by the KMT or spun off from the party through questionable sales or transfers — conditions that could prompt the committee to recognize it as an organization founded with ill-gotten party assets.
The committee on Tuesday last week released a report suggesting that the corps has close links to the KMT, as the party had control over the organization’s personnel, finances and management, with former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) directing it for 21 years before being succeeded by other KMT heavyweights.
Photo: CNA
The organization denied being affiliated with the KMT, saying it was a government agency before becoming an independent nonprofit foundation.
The corps was founded in 1955 as a government agency under the Ministry of National Defense, registered with the Ministry of the Interior as a “social movement organization” in 1970 and registered as an independent nonprofit organization in 1989, although KMT members were among its leaders, it said.
The committee has deliberately ignored organizational principles promulgated by the Executive Yuan in 1952 that were the legal foundation of the corps, and has instead cited the minutes of a 1952 KMT meeting in which a decision to create the organization was made, China Youth Corps lawyer Liu Chang-ping (劉昌坪) said.
Photo: Peter Lo, Taipei Times
“The committee has a predetermined position on this case, and its report listed only evidence unfavorable to the corps, suggesting its preconception,” Liu said.
The committee also hampered the organization’s efforts to prepare a defense, as the corps did not receive the report until Wednesday last week and did not finish reviewing more than 500 pages of appendices and evidence until Monday, he said, adding that the hearing should be invalid, as the organization was not given the legally required time to prepare.
Committee member Lien Li-jen (連立堅) said nearly 50 of the organization’s employees have been allowed to combine their years of work at the corps with time of government service to qualify for a public servant pension, a privilege awarded only to KMT employees.
Of all non-governmental organizations, the corps’ employees were the only ones given such a privilege, suggesting an unusual link with the KMT, Lien said.
The purpose of the organization is to assist the government, so its employees were considered de facto public servants, Liu said.
Corps research and development committee deputy director Cheng Fei-wen (鄭斐文) said no funds have been diverted to the KMT or any individual, adding that the foundation has no involvement in politics and should be excluded as an organization connected to ill-gotten party assets.
KMT Administration and Management Committee deputy director Lee Fu-hsuan (李福軒) said there is no evidence in the report indicating that the party had control over the corps, let alone a questionable spin-off.
The hearing was concluded without a final decision, but the assets committee is to determine whether further hearings are necessary.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS