Politicians across party lines reacted positively to the Council of Grand Justices’ constitutional interpretation yesterday that same-sex marriages should be protected by the Constitution, although the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus is still undecided on how such marriages should be legalized.
The Council of Grand Justices ruled that the Civil Code is unconstitutional for rejecting same-sex unions, and laws have to passed within two years to ensure marriage equality.
The ruling sparked a debate about whether an amendment to the Civil Code or a new law would be preferable for legalizing same-sex marriages.
Photo: CNA
DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said the DPP caucus could not make a decision on the format for the change until the Executive Yuan has drafted its own legislative proposal.
“The constitutional ruling does not dictate a special law or Civil Code amendment to legalize gay marriage, and the caucus respects different proposals made by individual lawmakers,” he said.
He urged the Executive Yuan to draft a proposal soon because it cannot, as the highest executive agency in the nation, be excused from such major legislation.
Ker rejected the possibility that same-sex marriages could be legalized quickly, as the current legislative session is about to end, and the schedule for a proposed extraordinary session is crowded with pension reform efforts and a major infrastructure bill.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus secretary-general Alicia Wang (王育敏) said marriage equality is a value espoused by most people, and the only issue left to be decided is how same-sex marriages should be legalized.
“The KMT caucus is open to both ideas [amending the Civil Code or a new law], and the caucus does not have a resolution in total approval or disapproval of either idea,” she said.
“The Ministry of Justice has an obligation to propose its own draft legislation, and it has to understand public opinion and adopt an approach that can be accepted by most citizens,” Wang said, adding the review of a draft amendment to the Civil Code proposed by DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) should await the ministry’s proposal.
Yu, whose proposal last year cleared review by a legislative committee, said a new law would violate constitutional rights to equality.
A special same-sex marriage law or a partnership law would be “a differential treatment based on sexual orientation,” which would be a form of “segregation despite [marriage] equality,” she said.
“The constitutional ruling, with its stress on equality, in fact hints at a direction for legalizing same-sex marriage, which is to revise the Civil Code,” Yu said, calling for a swift passage of her proposal in the extraordinary session.
The New Power Party pledged to push for a Civil Code amendment.
“The extraordinary legislative session in June can proceed with a Civil Code amendment. The Legislative Yuan has the responsibility to fully cooperate with the constitutional ruling and make improvements,” the party said in a statement.
People First Party Legislator Chen Yi-chieh (陳怡潔) said her party’s caucus did not have any preconception regarding how same-sex marriage should be legalized, and it would await a coordinated legislative initiative by the Executive Yuan and the DPP caucus.
Whether it be a special law or a Civil Code amendment, the legislative solution proposed should ensure social harmony, she said.
The Presidential Office said the law “has to guarantee marriage equality and freedom for all,” and the government should put forward a legislative proposal in accordance with the ruling and public opinions.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has called for tolerance and understanding, and urged the public to settle differences with democratic means, Presidential Office Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said.
The Executive Yuan said it fully respects the ruling, and the justice ministry would put forward a legislative proposal shortly.
The proposal would be put forward “under the principle of minimizing social conflicts and maximizing consensus,” it added, without hinting at whether the ministry would seek special legislation or an amendment.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS