The Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education yesterday announced that it would slash NT$54 million (US$1.78 million) from subsidies earmarked for National Taiwan University this year after several academics were involved in the scandal surrounding allegedly fraudulent papers published by National Taiwan University professor Kuo Min-liang’s (郭明良) research team.
The ministries released the results of their investigations into the scandal that erupted in November last year after users of online academic forum PubPeer found out that several papers Kuo’s team submitted to international science journals between 2006 and last year contained possibly falsified findings.
The ministries reviewed 18 papers written by Kuo’s team, of which 11 were found to be in breach of academic ethics.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The subsidy cut was proposed because the university had failed to curb academic misconduct, raising doubts among the public and tarnishing the nation’s academic reputation, Department of Higher Education Director Nicole Lee (李彥儀) told a news conference in Taipei.
The punishment is the most severe that the education ministry has ever handed an institution over breaches of academic ethics, she said.
A total of 13 academics implicated in the falsified research are to be punished.
Kuo, who served as the corresponding author and supervised research for all 18 papers, is to be barred from applying for science ministry research grants for 10 years for breaches of academic integrity, including duplicating and forging data presented in eight papers, and malfeasance in supervising the research.
The two ministries also ordered a recall of NT$4.05 million in research grants and prize money handed out to four academics.
Kuo, former dean of the university’s College of Life Science, is to return NT$1.54 million in research grants the science ministry gave him between 2005 and last year, in addition to NT$600,000 in cash awards he received from the education ministry for winning academic awards.
National Taiwan University associate professor of dentistry Chang Cheng-chi (張正琪), Kuo’s former doctoral student, falsified images, numbers and findings in four papers, including a 2013 paper published in Cell Death & Differentiation that contains falsified images.
As the 2013 paper was the key publication that earned Chang her title of associate professor, the university should disqualify her as a member of its teaching staff and deny her promotions for five to 10 years, Lee said.
The university might dismiss Chang either temporarily or permanent in accordance with the Teachers’ Act (教師法), Lee said.
National Taiwan University Hospital vice superintendent Lin Ming-tsan (林明燦) falsified images, numbers and research findings in all four of the group’s papers in which he was involved and in one paper also plagiarized others’ research, the investigation found.
He is to return NT$810,000 that the science ministry awarded to his projects between 2008 and last year, and could face dismissal from the university and demerits from the hospital, Lee said.
National Health Research Institutes associate researcher Su Jen-liang (蘇振良), who forged images in three papers published in international scientific journals between 2006 and 2007, is to turn in NT$345,000 in research grants he received between 2007 and last year, the science ministry said.
Su, whose doctoral dissertation in 2003 focused on research similar to that shown in two problematic papers he submitted in 2006, would have his doctorate revoked if his dissertation is also found to contain falsified information after further inquiry, Lee said.
Three master’s candidates — whose names were absent from the university’s independent investigation that concluded last month — provided falsified images and numbers for three problematic papers and are to have their diplomas revoked if the university confirms their offenses, Lee said.
The probe did not find any breaches of academic integrity by National Taiwan University president Yang Pan-chyr (楊泮池), who coauthored four problematic papers with Kuo and provided cell material samples for one of the problematic papers.
Ministry of Education Senior Specialist Wang Shu-chuang (王淑娟) said that Yang’s role in a 2006 paper published in the journal Cancer Cell was to provide cell material samples for use by Su in his research.
The paper underwent two “major” corrections in 2006 and 2008, and although it was unlikely that Yang could have any prior knowledge of the falsified portions in the paper, he should have been alarmed after the first instance and prevented it from being corrected the second time.
Considering this and the fact that his name appeared in the papers in titles ranging from the second author to the 12th author, damaging the school’s reputation, Yang should engage in introspection, Wang said.
The university had informed the ministry that Yang, whose term expires in June, would refrain from seeking another term, Wang said.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or