The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) made NT$7.6 billion (US$238.07 million) by selling the Broadcasting Corp of China (BCC, 中廣), the nation’s largest radio operator, but the party could be asked to return the proceeds to the state, the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee said yesterday.
The committee combed through a complex transaction history of the BCC spanning more than a decade involving transfer of equity and capital reduction and found that the KMT made about NT$7.6 billion by selling the radio operator, committee spokeswoman Shih Chin-fang (施錦芳) said.
The BCC, founded in 1928 as a broadcasting unit within the KMT, took over Japanese broadcasting facilities and equipment after World War II, and the the KMT held the BCC via party-owned Hua Hsia Investment Holding Co (華夏投資公司).
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
In 2005, the KMT transferred the equity of Hua Hsia Investment to other two party-owned companies — Central Investment Co (中央投資公司) and Kuanghua Securities Investment and Trust Co (光華證券投信) — and received NT$3.82 billion.
In 2006, Hua Hsia Investment sold the BCC, including its frequencies and buildings, to BCC chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) and four radio operators for NT$5.7 billion. However, Jaw and other buyers paid only NT$1 billion to acquire the BCC’s broadcasting facilities, but not its buildings.
The BCC later transferred its real-estate holdings — worth about NT$5.6 billion — to Kuanghua Co amid lawsuits launched by the government against the company over controversial properties the BCC appropriated from the Japanese.
Central Investment Co later acquired Kuanghua Co and transferred the BCC real-estate holdings to Hsinyutai Co (欣裕台股份有限公司, a spin-off of Central Investment Co.
In 2012, Kuanghua reduced its capital by NT$800 million and redistributed the money to Hsinyutai, which in turn transferred the money to its sole shareholder, the KMT.
Hsinyutai in 2013 reduced its capital by NT$2 billion and redistributed the money to the KMT.
Last year, Hsinyutai sold its holdings in Kuanghua to another company, Hsinkuanghua Co (欣光華), for NT$3 billion, which later reduced its capital by NT$2.9 billion and redistributed it the KMT.
“In the preparatory hearing on Friday [today], we have to understand whether the BCC and Central Motion Picture Corp (CMPC, 中央電影公司) were directly controlled by the KMT to determine whether they were KMT-affiliated organizations,” Shih said.
KMT Culture and Communications Committee deputy director Hu Wen-chi (胡文琦) said all the data revealed by Shih were investigated by prosecutors during former president Chen Shiu-bian’s (陳水扁) administration and no evidence of illegal activity between the BCC and the KMT was found.
The BCC has already returned controversial properties to the government, including those in Changhua and Hualien counties, as well as New Taipei City’s Banciao (板橋) and Bali (八里) districts, Hu said.
He called on the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee to investigate former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), former KMT treasurer Liu Tai-ying (劉泰英) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), who Hu said were involved in the BCC’s financial management and investments, but were not included in the investigations.
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say