The Legislative Yuan yesterday passed amendments to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), which lawmakers said returned the power to recall elected officials to the public after it was previously withheld due to high thresholds.
The act prior to amendment stipulated that for officials to be recalled more than half of eligible voters must ratify the proposal and at least half must then vote for the recall.
The amendment dropped the threshold for recall petitions from 2 percent of voters within the elected official’s constituency to 1 percent, while the number of signatures supporting the proposal was cut from 13 percent to 10 percent.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The amount of votes supporting the recall must reach at least a quarter of the original voting population of the constituency, down from half, with at least half voting for the recall.
The amendment also lifted the restrictions on campaign events, with all expenses occurred being tax-deductible. In addition, the restriction that a recall vote could not be held alongside another vote was removed.
The amendment also doubled the number of days for gathering petitions for the recall votes to 60 days for mayors and county commissioners, 40 days for county and city councilors and township mayors, and 20 days for township representatives and borough wardens.
Lawmakers had been divided on whether to retain a threshold for a recall vote, with the New Power Party (NPP) submitting a proposal to do away with such a limitation and adopt a “majority vote.”
The Legislative Yuan finally passed a version agreed upon by the People First Party (PFP) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which retained a threshold of a quarter of the original voting population of the constituency to guard against abuse of the recall system.
DPP lawmakers hailed the amendment as progress toward direct democracy, while Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers said the DPP might reap what it sowed should the government’s performance fail to satisfy the public.
DPP Legislator Chuang Ruei-hsiung (莊瑞雄) said the NPP’s version would have caused no end of strife due to officials being recalled over every misstep, adding that the lowering of the thresholds would make it easier for voters to exercise their right to recall officials.
The DPP administration would suffer the side-effects of such legislation in years to come, KMT Legislator Lin Te-fu (林德福) said, adding that the party would have to take responsibility for all the policies implemented by a DPP-led legislature.
There have already been calls to recall DPP Legislator Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘), Lin said.
Whether the DPP has harmed its own interests by amending the law remains to be seen, Lin added.
PFP Legislator Chen Yi-chieh (陳怡潔) said the public must have the rights to vote and recall, and the PFP supports the amendment, adding that any recall, so long as it is not politically motivated or based a sense of retribution, would be a good thing.
NPP Legislator Hsu Yung-ming (徐永明) said that despite the amendments not meeting the party’s expectations, it is a step in the right direction.
The NPP supported removing all of the thresholds as it felt that a simple majority would be the best method that represents public opinion, Hsu said.
Any form of threshold protects elected officials and infringes upon people’s rights, Hsu said.
The Project Appendectomy movement, which unsuccessfully sought to recall several KMT lawmakers following the Sunflower movement protests in 2014, issued a statement thanking the Legislative Yuan, saying that the amendment was not only a victory for the movement, but also “a victory for the people and a significant milestone for Taiwan’s democracy.”
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say