US president-elect Donald Trump’s upset win drew mixed reactions from academics and non-governmental organization (NGO) leaders yesterday, from speculation about new arms sales to Taiwan to concern over Taipei’s quest to join the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
A crowd of several hundred reporters, academics and NGO officials gathered for a US presidential election watch event organized by the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) and Taiwan Democracy Foundation in Taipei, milling through a Shangri-La Far Eastern Hotel ballroom while watching broadcasts of the election.
As servers bedecked in US flag-themed costumes served refreshments, the tension in the room rose as a tight race became apparent.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
While a mock poll of participants conducted by the AIT showed a small majority would have voted for Democratic US presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, participants gave widely varying responses when asked about their perception of the consequences of the election results for Taiwan.
“In Taiwan, political hands in both parties are very familiar with Clinton’s aides, so if she were elected, they would feel more at ease,” Tamkang University professor Alexander Huang (黃介正) said. “If Donald Trump was elected, there is going to be a lot of homework not only for us, but for the whole region, and there is a lot that is hard to predict.”
Lai I-chung (賴怡忠), an executive committee member of the pan-green Taiwan Thinktank, said Taiwan-US relations would remain stable, with the possibility of some new arms sales because of Trump’s emphasis on allies’ self-defense.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“The US’ foreign policy is not just the product of whatever the president says,” Lai said. “While it is still unclear what the content of Trump’s foreign policy will be, we will still have a strong Republican congress, as well as the Taiwan Relations Act and the ‘six assurances,’ so the basic structure of Taiwan-US relations should not change much even if Trump has some new ideas.”
“Trump has certainly made statements about East Asia that are different from traditional US policy, whether stating that South Korea and Japan could consider developing nuclear weapons or calling for East Asian countries to bear a greater part of the burden of defending themselves. However, while Japan and South Korea are definitely going to be nervous, there is also an increased possibility of further arms sales to Taiwan, with fewer of the restrictions that have been imposed in the past,” he said.
“There may be more pressure to purchase US arms, but they will not necessarily be useful weapons,” National Sun Yat-sen University political science professor Liao Da-chi (廖達琪) said, adding that Trump would likely be driven mainly by the desire to profit US firms.
The professor called for a full reconsideration of Taiwan’s policy toward the Asia-Pacific region in the face of new uncertainty about US foreign policy.
“Because Trump is a businessman without any background in politics, it is extremely hard to predict what he will do with regard to Taiwan, but he appears inclined to reduce the US’ involvement in foreign affairs,” she said. “While the Taiwan Relations Act will remain in place, presidents have substantial discretion over the extent to which they implement it.”
Other participants urged caution in predicting a potential impact, citing the geopolitical factors underpinning US foreign policy.
“We should be careful not to immediately label Trump as rash,” National Chung Hsing University Graduate Institute of International Politics professor Tsai Ming-yeng (蔡明彥) said, adding that who Trump names to his national security team would be a crucial signal of future policy direction.
“The overall alignment from the past several decades should not change, because it is the product of geopolitics, which is not something any one person can change, regardless of who is elected,” said Chang Tieh-chih (張鐵志), cofounder of the Chinese-language online publication The Reporter, while adding that the future of the TPP was uncertain because of Trump’s opposition to the deal.
“Trump said just a few days ago that Taiwan and Mexico were stealing US jobs. I am not clear why he singled us out, but the sense one gets is that all non-Americans are a drag on US economic development,” said Clarence Chou (周宇修), a director of the Campaign for Media Reform.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS