Members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus have been calling for a party-wide consensus on “one China, different interpretations,” as preparations are under way for a meeting between the KMT chairwoman and Chinese authorities in Beijing next month to discuss cross-strait ties.
In a bid to prevent a repeat of recent conflict over the matter, the caucus yesterday again said that KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) must adhere to the so-called “1992 consensus” of “one China, different interpretations.”
Conflicts within the party emerged when Hung pushed for “one China, same interpretation” to be adopted.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
The “1992 consensus” is a term former KMT lawmaker Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000 when he was head of the Mainland Affairs Council. It refers to a tacit understanding between the KMT and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Hung is to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next month at a forum on “peaceful cross-strait development.”
The KMT says “one China, different interpretations” gives Taiwan an advantage in cross-strait relations.
A statement issued by the KMT caucus yesterday said that Taiwan and China have entered a period of “cold peace,” which it said must be overcome through normal communications.
The KMT hopes for more opportunities to engage with China and has suggested an exchange of ideas on peaceful development, the statement said.
The statement said that prior to exchanges or implementation of important cross-strait policies, the party headquarters should comprehensively brief the caucus, adding that it would get input from the public to “signify the importance placed on public opinion within the party’s central leadership and improve the effectiveness of promoting exchange activities.”
KMT caucus convener Sufin Siluko (廖國棟) said cross-strait peace is a huge topic, adding that he supports Hung’s attendance at the Beijing forum.
He said the forum would allow “Taiwan’s voice to be heard in Beijing,” adding that he hopes Hung can express the caucus’ stance on the “1992 consensus” at an opportune time.
He said that five legislators are to attend the forum and that the caucus would not stand in the way of anyone who sought to attend, adding that it would be best if all 35 KMT lawmakers were in their legislative seats next month with the next session expected be a tug-of-war.
KMT Legislator Lin Te-fu (林德福) said that while legislators are talking about whether to attend the forum in Beijing, there is still no consensus within the party itself.
He said that the caucus and the party’s central leadership must work together to ensure good communication.
Lin said that Hung should look at what was said at past meetings between KMT heads and Xi, adding that he believes Hung should “be smart enough to say one China, different interpretations, just as former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did.”
“I am sure the Chinese authorities will understand our position. The ideas brought up by the caucus should be valued by them,” Lin said.
KMT Culture and Communications Committee director Chow Chi-wai (周志偉) said that the caucus’ position on cross-strait interaction is in agreement with the party’s central leadership.
He said that the KMT would continue building on the established foundation of promoting cross-strait interaction, peaceful policies and economic development.
Chow said the caucus is the division of the party most capable of participating in and supervising the central government, adding that he hopes the party would work in unity to put the KMT back in power.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS