Setting preconditions for cross-strait exchanges are not conducive to “meaningful dialogue,” Presidential Office spokesperson Alex Huang (黃重諺) said yesterday.
“Preconditions are not necessary for meaningful dialogue; only those [without preconditions] can facilitate genuine understanding between the two sides. Maintaining peace and stability across the Strait is the responsibility of both sides, and the Presidential Office believes that any initiative that improves mutual understanding is a worthy and positive effort,” Huang said.
Huang’s remark was in response to comments made yesterday by China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍), who said that as long as the political foundation of the so-called “1992 consensus” remains solid, cross-strait exchanges can still be pushed forward.
Photo: CNA
The “1992 consensus” — a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted to making up in 2000 — refers to a supposed understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have never recognized the existence of such an agreement. China consequently cut off official channels of communication with Taiwan after Tsai was sworn in as president on May 20.
A Taiwanese delegation, comprised of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and independent heads of local governments or their deputies, on Saturday arrived in Beijing and met with Zhang and Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference chairman Yu Zhengsheng (俞正聲) ostensibly to discuss tourism and trade-related issues. The delegation, whose members include Hsinchu Commissioner Chiu Ching-chun (邱鏡淳), Miaoli Commissioner Hsu Yao-chang (徐耀昌), Hualien Commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁), Lienchiang Commissioner Liu Tseng-ying (劉增應), New Taipei City Deputy Mayor Yeh Hui-ching (葉惠青), Taitung County Deputy Commissioner Chen Chin-hu (陳金虎) and Kinmen Deputy Commissioner Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), called for both sides of the Strait to choose a “broad avenue” on which cross-strait economic, tourism, cultural and agricultural cooperation can be continued.
Photo: CNA
Zhang said the Taiwanese delegation is visiting China because local government heads are “disturbed” by the “severe impact” on cross-strait relations that arose from “changes in Taiwan’s political situation following May 20.”
The delegates “recognize the 1992 consensus and support peaceful development,” Zhang said, adding that the attendees have agreed “to insist on the 1992 consensus as a common political foundation, regardless of changes in the situation.”
“City-to-city exchanges are to continue under the precondition that the Taiwanese local governmental heads support the 1992 consensus,” he said.
National Taiwan University professor of political science Fan Shih-ping (范世平) said that by holding the meeting, Beijing runs the risk of tacitly admitting that Chinese tourists are a tool of united front political warfare, while calling into question the meeting’s ability to change the overall cross-strait conditions in any meaningful way.
“It seems that the TAO is doing busy work to fill quotas for the benefit of its higher-ups,” he said.
It is inappropriate for county commissioners and city mayors to visit Beijing at a time when they should be providing disaster relief to their constituents after the typhoons last week, DPP Legislator Cheng Yun-peng (鄭運鵬) said, adding that Beijing’s attempt to divide Taiwan’s local governments would lead to “backlash from residents of other counties and cities.”
A senior official involved in cross-strait affairs speaking on the condition of anonymity said that Beijing is believed to regard the delegation as little more than tool for “1992 consensus” propaganda and the delegates are unlikely to wring any concrete guarantees from China.
Additional reporting by CNA
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS