Shanghai Municipal Committee United Front Work Department Director Sha Hailin (沙海林) yesterday said that exchanges between Taipei and Shanghai are conducted under the “one China” principle, which he said was supported by Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) respect for, and understanding of, the so-called “1992 consensus.”
Speaking at the Taipei-Shanghai Forum at the Regent Taipei hotel, Sha, who was supposed to give a 15-minute speech, talked for nearly half an hour, as he expounded on China’s hope of bringing together people on both sides of the Strait.
“I, with the delegation I lead, have come here to cement the friendship between the two cities, promote mutual understanding and deepen the emotional bond between residents of the two cities,” he said.
“[We have come] to write a [song] about brothers, that blood is thicker than water; to celebrate a familial bond across the Taiwan Strait; to cultivate a community of common good and destiny; and to realize the noble goal of reviving the Zhonghua minzu [中華民族, Chinese ethnic group],” he said.
Sha said that over the past eight years, cross-strait ties have benefited greatly from the bedrock of the “1992 consensus,” as shown in the frequent exchanges carried out between the two societies.
All these achievements were made because there had been a “correct” understanding of cross-strait relations and intercity exchanges, he said.
“However, due to a reason everybody knows, something we do not wish to see has transpired in cross-strait affairs,” he said.
“Nevertheless we will remain stalwart in our goal to continue to improve the emotional bond and welfare of people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, come what may,” Sha said. “The people on both sides are one family that share one fate and one future.”
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted that he had made up in 2000, refers to a supposed understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Speaking on the forum’s theme of “a vibrant city,” Sha said that there are five sources of Shanghai’s vibrancy: Trade reform and liberalization, a high-tech sector that focuses on innovation, continuous investment in education, a wide fiber-to-the-home network footprint, an expansive social welfare system that covers long-term healthcare and subsidies on social security premiums, affordable housing and a policy-driven job market.
Sha said about 550 Taiwanese are working in Shanghai’s high-tech sector, high schools and hospitals.
About 2,200 Taiwanese students enroll in Shanghai universities and high schools every year, he said, adding that funding from the Shanghai Municipal Government has helped about 30,000 Taiwanese start businesses there this year.
He said that Shanghai would continue to push policies that would strengthen the bonds and promote the welfare of people on both sides of the Strait.
In his speech, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) reiterated the “2015 new perspective” that he touted at last year’s forum in Shanghai, which is based on “four reciprocal actions” — knowing, understanding, respecting and working with each other — during his concluding remarks, saying that these four actions are gestures of goodwill.
Taipei needs to take the initiative in these four actions and “reach out” if it wants people to collaborate with it, he said.
Taipei is the most liberal city in Taiwan, as Shanghai is in China; therefore, the two cities should learn to bear with each other’s differences, he said.
“Only when we learn to tolerate, thereby appreciate, different views can we build a liberal society and a civilized city,” he said. “While we understand and respect China’s insistence on ‘certain issues,’ we also hope that China will understand and respect Taiwan’s insistence on democratic and liberal values,” he said.
When asked to expound on the “basis” for exchanges between the two cities during a question-and-answer session, Sha told reporters that in addition to the “1992 consensus,” the Taipei City Government’s creation of a Mainland Affairs Division, which deals with issues between Taipei and Shanghai, shows that Taipei has the “right concept” in approaching intercity exchanges.
Asked to comment on Sha’s insistence on the “one China” principle, Ko said that he understands and respects what Sha must say given his position.
“He [Sha] would get in trouble if he said something wrong,” Ko said.
Ko evaded a question on whether Sha’s interpretation of the title of the Taipei’s Mainland Affairs Division meant that he had belittled the city.
Asked whether Sha really understood Taiwan’s democratic and liberal values, Ko said: “I think so, why else would he agree to come?”
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say