President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), for the first time since her inauguration, implicitly dismissed the so-called “1992 consensus” in an interview with the Washington Post, saying it is unlikely that her government would agree to a deadline for accepting conditions that go against the public’s will.
Tsai gave her first exclusive interview since taking office with Washington Post senior associate editor Lally Weymouth at the Presidential Office Building on Monday, with the president talking at length about cross-strait ties and the Taiwan-US relationship.
“I am certain that as a national leader, [Chinese President] Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) is equipped with the ability to make a good and a right decision based on a comprehensive review of all the situations,” Tsai said when asked to verify reports that Xi has set a deadline for her to accept the “1992 consensus.”
Photo: CNA, courtesy of the Office of the President
Tsai said that given Taiwan has evolved into a mature democracy, where trends in public opinion matter greatly, it is unlikely that the government would accede to conditions set by the other side that are against the will of the people.
“I believe that they [Chinese authorities] are aware of this,” Tsai said.
The “1992 consensus,” a term former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000, refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Tsai has so far merely expressed respect for the “1992 talks.”
Praising Xi’s courage in tackling corruption as being conducive to the development of Chinese society, Tsai said she hoped that Xi could “show a bit more flexibility” in dealing with cross-strait relations and appreciate Taiwan’s democracy.
With regard to her plans for handling ties with Beijng amid a reported decrease in official cross-strait communications, Tsai said there are diverse channels of communication across the Taiwan Strait, including official links and person-to-person ties.
“There are differences between the positions held on either side of the Strait. In Taiwan, we have done our best to minimize that gap. I believe that the Chinese realize the goodwill we put forth at the inauguration,” Tsai said.
However, she declined to go into much detail when asked whether she is in touch with Chinese government officials, saying only that different levels of government have a variety of ways to communicate with their counterparts in Beijing.
Weymouth asked Tsai how she plans to strike a balance between maintaining cross-strait stability and responding to the expectations of her younger supporters, most of whom identify themselves as “Taiwanese” rather than “Chinese” and are perceived as champions of Taiwanese independence.
“It is a fact that different generations — and different people of different ethnic origins — have different views on China,” Tsai said. “However, they all agree on one thing: That is democracy.”
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) yesterday said that the maintenance of peaceful cross-strait development is supported by mainstream public opinion on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
“Only by adhering to the 1992 consensus and its core meaning — that both sides belong to one China — can peaceful development of cross-strait ties be ensured,” Ma said.
Ma said that the communication mechanism between the TAO and the MAC, as well as between the semi-official Straits Exchange Foundation and its Chinese counterpart, the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, are both built on the “1992 consensus.”
ONE LAST TALK: While Xi said that Taiwan was a ‘red line,’ Biden, in what is likely his last meeting with Xi as president, called for an end to China’s military activity around Taiwan China’s military intimidation and economic coercion against Taiwan are the main causes of tensions that are destabilizing peace in the Taiwan Strait, Taipei said yesterday while thanking US President Joe Biden for expressing Washington’s firm stance of maintaining peace and stability in the region. Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) met on Saturday for their third meeting and their first talks in seven months on the sidelines of the APEC forum in Lima, Peru. It was likely Biden’s last meeting as president with Xi. During their conversation, Biden reiterated the US’ opposition to any unilateral change to the “status quo” from either
Taiwan would participate in the 2026 APEC summit to be hosted by China after Beijing promised it would ensure the personal safety of attendees, Taiwanese national security sources said yesterday. The APEC Leaders’ Machu Picchu Declaration announced yesterday said that China would host the APEC summit in 2026. Beijing proposed hosting the summit shortly before this year’s gathering began on Friday, a national security official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Many APEC members expressed concerns about China hosting the event and said that prior communication over the decision was insufficient, the official said. Taiwan brought up concerns about legal “guidelines” China announced in
SUPPORT: Arms sales to NATO Plus countries such as Japan, South Korea and Israel only have to be approved by the US Congress if they exceed US$25m The US should amend a law to add Taiwan to the list of “NATO Plus” allies and streamline future arms sales, a US commission said on Tuesday in its annual report to the US Congress. The recommendation was made in the annual report by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC), which contained chapters on US-China economic and trade ties, security relations, and Taiwan and Hong Kong. In the chapter on Taiwan, the commission urged the US Congress to “amend the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 to include Taiwan on the list of ‘NATO Plus’ recipients,” referring to
Minister of Labor Ho Pei-shan (何佩珊) said she would tender her resignation following criticism of her handling of alleged bullying by Ministry of Labor Workforce Development Agency branch director Hsieh Yi-jung (謝宜容) resulting in the death of an employee. The ministry yesterday gave Hsieh two demerits and said she is subject to review by the Disciplinary Court. The severest possible punishment would be her removal from office and being barred from government jobs indefinitely. Workforce Development Agency Director-General Tsai Meng-liang (蔡孟良) also received a major demerit and was transferred to another position. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) issued a formal apology
RSS