The management of China Airlines (CAL, 中華航空) yesterday reached an agreement with its employees’ union on the union’s eight listed demands in negotiations, averting a potential de facto strike by workers on Friday, CAL chief executive officer Hsieh Shih-chien (謝世謙) said.
Hsieh headed into yesterday’s session to negotiate with representatives of the China Airlines Employees Union, which covers ground staff, pilots, maintenance workers and other China Airlines employees, following objections and heated exchanges between the two sides in the previous day’s talks.
He confirmed having deliberated on the eight demands put forward by the union in the two-day session, and that both sides have signed a formal agreement, but he declined to give any details of the settlement.
Photo: CNA
Some revisions were made to the eight demands, but they were acceptable to the union, according to representatives at the session, which took place at a CAL office building at the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport.
The union representatives agreed to settle and announced that they would cancel the planned labor protest on Friday, which called for members not to show up for work by calling in sick for the day.
The CAL labor dispute centered on working conditions and pay issues, including long-frozen annual seniority-based raises and back pay accrued during the freeze.
“We received in this agreement what CAL had owed us for the past 20 years,” union spokeswoman Wang Chao-jung (王昭蓉) said.
She said that some employees might see “minor differences” between their original demands and those now contained in the agreement, “but this is the result of negotiation. If we insist on getting everything, then there might not be a settlement, and both sides would suffer, which would end up sacrificing the rights of passengers.”
“Right at the start, our union believed the battle should take place during negotiation talks, and should not be fought in the street,” she said, distancing her union from the two-day strike by CAL flight attendants last weekend, which saw sit-in demonstrations in front of the CAL headquarters in Taipei and led to nearly 200 flight cancellations and other kinds of disruptions and headaches for thousands of stranded passengers.
“With solidarity by union members, we can get what we want, and there was no need to hold anyone hostage to reach this agreement,” Wang said.
In their demands, the union had asked that the commuting time of all CAL employees be included in the calculation of their work hours, that the travel allowance for all pilots and cabin crew be raised to US$5 per hour, that the subsidy for ground staff members be increased and that the number of their days off — weekends, holidays and national holidays — be increased from 118 to 123 days.
Other requests included increasing benefits and other remuneration for hourly paid workers, increasing the subsidy for professional certificates and providing accommodation and transportation for employees assigned to work in a foreign country, while maintaining their subsidies.
Previous negotiations between the union and CAL’s new chairman, Ho Nuan-hsuan (何煖軒), had broken down after three rounds of talks on Monday, which led the union to decide that one-third of its members would take leave on Friday.
Additional reporting by CNA
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say