Prosecutors yesterday summoned Chinatrust Charity Foundation chairman Jeffrey Koo Jr (辜仲諒), CTBC Financial Holding (中信金控) chairman Yen Wen-long (顏文隆) and Gobo Group (國寶集團) president Chu Guo-rong (朱國榮) for questioning in connection with judicial investigations into possible financial irregularities in four cases of alleged insider trading, profiteering on real-estate transactions and illegal transfers of company funds.
The Special Investigation Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, a unit in charge of major corruption and economic crimes, is probing leading financial companies and business tycoons, with billions of New Taiwan dollars reported to have changed hands in a number of allegedly illegal deals.
SID officials said at a media briefing that they raided 58 offices and residences across the nation yesterday to gather evidence, while summoning 94 people for questioning.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
The operation mobilized 18 prosecutors, 218 criminal investigators, 150 prosecutor-investigator officials and 62 judicial police officers, they said.
“The SID is working with the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office on judicial probes into CTBC Financial Holding and Gobo Group on possible breaches of the Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法) and the Banking Act (銀行法),” SID spokesman Kuo Wen-tung (郭文東) said.
Aside from his role with the foundation, Koo is a major shareholder in CTBC Financial Holding and is known as the man responsible for the company’s day-to-day management.
Photo: CNA
The SID said that from 2003 to 2007, CTBC Financial Holding illegally transferred company assets worth about US$300 million into accounts controlled by Koo on the pretext of investing in subsidiaries.
Prosecutors said board members or employees of CTBC Financial Holding might have formed a shell company to partner with publicly listed Chong Hong Construction Co (長虹建設) to purchase a plot of land in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) to construct an office building.
Prosecutors said collaborators in the deal sold the land to the financial holding company’s banking unit, CTBC Bank Co Ltd (中國信託銀行) for more than NT$5 billion (US$155.2 million) and pocketed the difference.
CTBC Financial Holding bought MetLife Taiwan Life Insurance Co (大都會人壽) and renamed it CTBC Life Insurance Co (中信人壽) and later bought Taiwan Life Insurance Co (台灣人壽) and merged it with CTBC Life Insurance, keeping the Taiwan name.
The SID accused the holding company of insider trading and financial irregularities during the purchases last year, saying that the company used funds from CTBC Life Insurance to purchase collateral from Gobo Group, with Gobo making NT$200 million to NT$300 million from the deal.
Chong Hong chairman Lee Wen-tsao (李文造) was also summoned for questioning yesterday.
CTBC Financial Holding and Chong Hong Construction issued statements saying that the land transaction was executed according to the law, adding that they hope that the truth would come out as soon as possible.
Prosecutors and judicial officials were seen carrying dozens of cartons of documents after raids at CTBC Financial Holding’s headquarters, its company offices and other locations.
Prosecutors also summoned tycoon Kuo Chuan-ching (郭銓慶), former chairman of construction firm Rich Development Co (力麒建設), who emerged after questioning yesterday evening.
The questioning was still ongoing as of press time last night.
Additional reporting by CNA
SEPARATE: The MAC rebutted Beijing’s claim that Taiwan is China’s province, asserting that UN Resolution 2758 neither mentions Taiwan nor grants the PRC authority over it The “status quo” of democratic Taiwan and autocratic China not belonging to each other has long been recognized by the international community, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday in its rebuttal of Beijing’s claim that Taiwan can only be represented in the UN as “Taiwan, Province of China.” Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) yesterday at a news conference of the third session at the 14th National People’s Congress said that Taiwan can only be referred to as “Taiwan, Province of China” at the UN. Taiwan is an inseparable part of Chinese territory, which is not only history but
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
CROSSED A LINE: While entertainers working in China have made pro-China statements before, this time it seriously affected the nation’s security and interests, a source said The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) late on Saturday night condemned the comments of Taiwanese entertainers who reposted Chinese statements denigrating Taiwan’s sovereignty. The nation’s cross-strait affairs authority issued the statement after several Taiwanese entertainers, including Patty Hou (侯佩岑), Ouyang Nana (歐陽娜娜) and Michelle Chen (陳妍希), on Friday and Saturday shared on their respective Sina Weibo (微博) accounts a post by state broadcaster China Central Television. The post showed an image of a map of Taiwan along with the five stars of the Chinese flag, and the message: “Taiwan is never a country. It never was and never will be.” The post followed remarks
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
RSS