Minister of Health and Welfare-designate Lin Tzou-yien (林奏延) is to attend the annual World Health Assembly (WHA) on behalf of the incoming Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, despite the invitation’s stipulation that Taiwan’s participation should be in accordance with the “one China” principle and UN Resolution 2758, future Cabinet spokesperson Tung Chen-yuan (童振源) said yesterday.
“The [incoming] government will not be absent from the WHA, and is to appoint Lin as the representative,” Tung told a news conference at the DPP’s headquarters in Taipei yesterday. “However, our participation does not mean that we accept the conditions proposed by the WHO secretariat, and we think it is unnecessary for the WHO to make the stipulation.”
Whether the government should send a representative to the meeting has caused controversy because it is the first time since Taiwan began participating in the WHA under the name “Chinese Taipei” in 2009 that it has received an invitation mentioning the “one China” principle and UN Resolution No. 2758, which was passed on Oct. 25, 1971, and recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as “the only legitimate representative of China to the UN.”
Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times
Tung said that according to the WHO charter, the right to health is a fundamental and universal right, and that is why Taiwan would contribute to the WHO.
“The right of Taiwanese to fully participate in the international community should not be restricted by any political framework,” Tung said. “Therefore, the ‘one China’ principle based on UN Resolution 2758 added to the invitation issued by the WHO secretariat has no connection to Taiwan’s participation in the WHA.”
Thefore, the DPP has asked the government to continue to negotiate with the WHO over the “unnecessary connection” between Taiwan’s participation and the “one China” principle and requested that the Ministry of Health and Welfare clarify the stance in its reply to the WHO.
In related news, Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) yesterday shrugged off the controversy over the unprecedented “one China” proviso attached to the WHA invitation, saying Beijing is allowed to have its own interpretation of what “China” means under the so-called “1992 consensus.”
“The consensus states that both sides acknowledge there is one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means. It is this consensus, along with [President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) pledges of] no independence, no unification and no use of force, that have allowed cross-strait ties to move from confrontation to peaceful development,” Wu said.
The “1992 consensus” — a term former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) admitted making up in 2000 — is a tacit understanding reached between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government in 1992 that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Wu said he was once asked by lawmakers during a legislative question-and-answer session when he served as premier why Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), then-chairman of China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, did not interpret “China” as the Republic of China (ROC) when he visited Taiwan.
“We should just let them [Beijing] have their own interpretation of what ‘China’ means and we could also have ours... This is the essence of the consensus of ‘one China, with different interpretations,’” Wu said.
Separately yesterday, DPP Legislator Wang Ding-yu (王定宇) of the Democratic Progressive Party launched an online poll on Facebook to gauge what Taiwanese think is the best solution to the WHA conundrum.
“We all know that domestically, Ma’s administration has confined Taiwan with the ‘1992 consensus’ illusion, while singing in chorus with Beijing’s ‘one China’ principle on the outside… The government and its people now have three options — which one do you think will be the best for Taiwan’s future?” Wang wrote.
The options Wang offered are: attending the WHA for the sake of Taiwan’s international space, but lodging a stern protest during the meeting; attending the WHA without taking any measures to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty; or refusing to attend the conference as a way of rejecting the “one China” proviso.
As of press time last night, netizens were divided between the first and third options.
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘CORRECT IDENTIFICATION’: Beginning in May, Taiwanese married to Japanese can register their home country as Taiwan in their spouse’s family record, ‘Nikkei Asia’ said The government yesterday thanked Japan for revising rules that would allow Taiwanese nationals married to Japanese citizens to list their home country as “Taiwan” in the official family record database. At present, Taiwanese have to select “China.” Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said the new rule, set to be implemented in May, would now “correctly” identify Taiwanese in Japan and help protect their rights, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The statement was released after Nikkei Asia reported the new policy earlier yesterday. The name and nationality of a non-Japanese person marrying a Japanese national is added to the
AT RISK: The council reiterated that people should seriously consider the necessity of visiting China, after Beijing passed 22 guidelines to punish ‘die-hard’ separatists The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has since Jan. 1 last year received 65 petitions regarding Taiwanese who were interrogated or detained in China, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. Fifty-two either went missing or had their personal freedoms restricted, with some put in criminal detention, while 13 were interrogated and temporarily detained, he said in a radio interview. On June 21 last year, China announced 22 guidelines to punish “die-hard Taiwanese independence separatists,” allowing Chinese courts to try people in absentia. The guidelines are uncivilized and inhumane, allowing Beijing to seize assets and issue the death penalty, with no regard for potential
‘UNITED FRONT’ FRONTS: Barring contact with Huaqiao and Jinan universities is needed to stop China targeting Taiwanese students, the education minister said Taiwan has blacklisted two Chinese universities from conducting academic exchange programs in the nation after reports that the institutes are arms of Beijing’s United Front Work Department, Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) said in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) published yesterday. China’s Huaqiao University in Xiamen and Quanzhou, as well as Jinan University in Guangzhou, which have 600 and 1,500 Taiwanese on their rolls respectively, are under direct control of the Chinese government’s political warfare branch, Cheng said, citing reports by national security officials. A comprehensive ban on Taiwanese institutions collaborating or
RSS