The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday accused former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) of “acting like a concubine to Japan” after he reportedly said that sending military vessels to protect Taiwanese fishing boats amounts to declaring war on the US and Japan.
Hsieh, who is to be the next representative to Japan, on Wednesday said that he did not approve of sending military vessels to protect Taiwanese boats because it means that the nation “sees waging war as a viable option if necessary.”
He reportedly added that since Japan has a treaty of mutual cooperation and security with the US, the so-called “Anpo Treaty,” waging war with Japan would also mean waging a war against the US.
Photo: CNA
Peaceful means and negotiations should be employed to protect the interests of Taiwan’s fishermen, he said.
KMT spokeswoman Wang Hong-wei (王鴻薇) said she could not understand how Hsieh could have made such “remarks that were none other than surrender of [Taiwan’s] rights and humiliation of his country.”
She called into question the “closed-door meeting” on Thursday between president-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Nobuo Kishi, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s younger brother and a Japanese House of Councilors member, who is visiting Taipei with a group of Japanese lawmakers.
“Kishi said [Japan] hopes the issue of fishing rights can be solved in a low-key way. Tsai should make public the discussion she and Kishi had behind closed doors and be clear on the question of whether she will protect fishermen and their rights after she is sworn in,” Wang said.
Former KMT legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said that Hsieh’s attitude “can be compared to that of a concubine. [What Hsieh has done] was acting like a concubine to Japan, currying favor with it; it was geisha diplomacy.’”
The former lawmaker said that sending military vessels constitutes “military diplomacy,” according to which “the end is diplomacy, while the military is the means.”
He said Hsieh’s comments were “ridiculous,” and asked whether the US was also declaring war against China when it sent military vessels into international waters in the South China Sea.
“During the eight years of Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] rule, a fisheries agreement between Taiwan and Japan was not signed precisely because the DPP did not stand up to [Japan’s claims]. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration was able to achieve it because it changed its stance [toward Japan] after Ma took over and sent Coast Guard Administration vessels to protect the fishing boats” in the face of Japan’s intimidation on the sea, Lin said.
Japan “bullies those who are nice and is afraid only of the strong and mean,” he said, adding that Japan is “not a country that talks sense,” but is treating Taiwan “in a colonial way.”
Philip Yang (楊永明), an international relations academic and one of KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) spokespeople during the presidential campaign, said the navy “keeping alert within a certain distance from coast guard vessels when the latter are protecting the fishing boats” is “standard operating procedure.”
“Hsieh’s comments show that he is not qualified to be a representative of the Republic of China,” Yang said.
Hsieh later yesterday rebutted the KMT’s criticism on Facebook, saying that it took his remarks out of context.
He also denied that he said sending naval ships to the Okinotori atoll amounts to “declaring war against the US.”
Hsieh said that he firmly believes the government must protect Taiwanese fishermen, and that while the government might show its determination to do so through a show of force, the dispute can only be solved through negotiations.
“What I said was that it is inappropriate to dispatch naval ships for the action, because the presence of naval ships would hint that [we] might be prepared to take military action,” Hsieh said. “If any unexpected situation occurs, there would be military or civilian casualties, while the stock market would crash and the economy could fall apart.”
Hsieh said that he then said that since it is not an option for Taiwan to declare war on Japan or on the US, there is no need to send naval ships to the disputed waters.
“So what I actually said was that it is not something we would do — I did not say that sending naval ships was tantamount to declaring war on the US,” Hsieh said.
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) yesterday morning said that Ma should “stop these childish actions,” questioning Ma’s “sudden fearlessness” in the past two weeks of his presidency, after being weak for the past eight years.
Premier Simon Chang (張善政) said that navy vessels would be sent “just in case” and urged the lawmaker to ask Tsai what she meant by “making full efforts to defend” the nation’s fishermen when asked about Japan’s seizure of a Taiwanese fishing boat last week.
Separately yesterday, Kishi and his entourage visited the Legislative Yuan for the establishment of the Taiwan-Japan (Congressional) Exchange Club, at which Legislative Speaker Su Jia-chyuan (蘇嘉全) said the two countries are intimate partners that should solve disputes and conflicts with wisdom.
Kishi said Taiwan and Japan are important to each other and the recent problems could be overcome.
Additional reporting by Loa Iok-sin
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
The National Development Council (NDC) yesterday unveiled details of new regulations that ease restrictions on foreigners working or living in Taiwan, as part of a bid to attract skilled workers from abroad. The regulations, which could go into effect in the first quarter of next year, stem from amendments to the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) passed by lawmakers on Aug. 29. Students categorized as “overseas compatriots” would be allowed to stay and work in Taiwan in the two years after their graduation without obtaining additional permits, doing away with the evaluation process that is currently required,